but some would

so it's probably true, knowing google and this constant obsession with apologising for muslims

they weren't @Tonight at 11 - DOOM ,

if you look historical research, there's theories that muhammad didn't even exist

ye, they were popular 40 years ago

@Violetskies, you trust Google?

Mecca wasn't marked on byzantine maps till 3 centuries later

ofc not, re-read dude

Omayyids used crosses on their coins

and then it turned out that more research points to him exsting actually

Oof

what DO you trust @Violetskies

your sources are old research

That's a good question. What do you trust?

What can anyone trust?

General Relativity: Publish 1914

Old doesn't mean invalid

it's just a theory

another one is that he was actually from petra

rather than Mecca.

ye

I know

as I said

this is old reasearch

I generally throw out anything a Marxist has to say, but listen to and am critical of other ideologies.

made largelly invalid by more recent stuff

like?

I read about this shit years ago

recent = more valid?

lol

oh ffs

not in the social sciences

i never read the english lit. just the arabic one

ofc that recent doesn't necessarily mean more valid you moron

so uh, what's your sources?

Where did the social sciences even come from? What are they rooted in?

I just mean that more archeological info has been collected since then

and it points in other directions

say whwat you MEAN, MEAN what you SAY.... moron

well if you look at the manuscripts

It seems to exist just to perpetuate propaganda