Liberty has a price you mongs. You don't defend liberty. You build it. In yourself. So every generation has to do it. And there are specific ways you need to do to achieve that. MEANING liberty is not freedom of everything. It's only freedom to achieve liberty. Things that go against liberty MUST be at least disencentivised if not banned (depending on severity). Freedom of everything is the DEATH of liberty.

but social projects and spending by a gov, when levying a tax to help where needed, not a bad thing

same reason why superstates are terrible

and if people where literally bread with a socio economic principles of communism, otherwise humans will human

but the government should make every effort to let the free market solve the issues

Oh no

A libertarian

and only step in when theres a catastrophic failure, and step out when it is resolved

>People making massive generalisations about things they know little about. Why am I not surprised it's on this server?

You need healing

Quick run before the retarded spreads

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM what do you mean i cant just enslave 12 year old girls and fuck them senseless while whipping my cotton picking niggers with the mass whipper 9000?

The only place to run to is the asylum

Or am I already in one

Ah I see another man of culture

@smiley because any disagreement would cause it to collapse

you can have collectively run organisations - they already exist

Such as

sure, democracy could work but itd eventually lead to one group oppressing the other

or several groups

etc

you catch my drift

if one group restricts the democratic potential of another group then it is not a democracy

it is a basic violation of democratic principles

glad you agree mass immigration is anti-democratic

kek

government is the ultimate punishment for our sins

glad you agree superstates are anti-democratic

nvm the fact that regardless of what happens, communism will always lead to one thing, Strong Men Rule or a Complete Oligarchic Elite ruling
Even if Communism was to work it would either lead to total Anarchy where it's survival of the fittest and rule of the strong or it'd revert to Anarcho Capitalism

but also the only cure for our sins

Sometimes it really hurts to watch the west being so retarded. You were cool once <:why:462286147473637407>

logically it can't be true that the members of an association ought to govern themselves by the democratic process, and at the same time a majority of the association may properly strip a minority of its primary political rights. by doing so, the majority would deny the minority the rights necessary to the democratic process. in effect therefore the majority would affirm that the association ought not to govern itself by the democratic process. they can't have it both ways.

The us guberment is collectively run

well, thats true, but if nobody can enforce this concept then it'll eventually devolve into no longer being a democracy

many people desire to be led, few desire to lead

true happiness is being told what to do and never having to worry

and if youre gonna force people to partake in that organization then its no longer free

Logically speaking you can't spend money you don't have

Can we all agree that democracy is not appropriate in every instance?

And yet