Message from @Lucien
Discord ID: 604381434228244481
@ETBrooD No I am saying - people are allowed to be territorial. We are humanly like that. But, certain cultures are extreme and their extreme behaviour causes pockets of the UK to have more of them than there are white people, because they decided to marry their cousins from Pakistan. Which in turn has created the racial tensions.
I just like to show people proof because it's still an ongoing problem for their gene pool means they can't evolve.
So I'm right then, your argument doesn't concern me
Stop wasting my time please, don't address me if it doesn't concern me
I don't like talking to Americans when it comes to the reasons why , the Pakistani people or the communist countries are underdeveloped. Because you get all triggered and take things subjectively . You can't do that if you're present facts.
I'm European and not everyone cares about the things that you care about
I appreciate your efforts, don't get me wrong. But you need to understand that people have their things to worry about, just as you have yours
Even as a European, you know communism - affected the development of certain countries, right? So, stop getting all emotional about it and start understanding that - you're genetic disposition is; one that's forced. Its only natural when there's no other influences .
https://www.friendsofeurope.org/insights/europes-migration-challenge-from-integration-to-inclusion/
They say so themselves and admit, it's creating discrimination:
```Second, we argue that many well-intentioned programmes aimed at giving special preferences to migrants and refugees ignore the needs of local communities, thereby exacerbating rather than facilitating inclusion.```
@TEABAG!!! tell them to repeal article 13/17 if they are replacing european union with new members
That's one shift that still gives me a migraine- why the hell did immigration (retitled in newspeak migration to make it sound more "natural") become about inclusion rather than integration?
Becaue “Diversity is our strength, you dirty fascist. You just hate brown people“
Also an emasculated native population that will let anything happen to them for goodboy points
the europe and america is moving into dangerous nazi territory
becoming more and more fascist by the day
@Aquila Fiacra I'm diverse in my opinions, I hate every race differently <:korrinsip:441279589491146763>
*that was a joke for anyone that is retarded*
Can't join oof
article 13
https://www.dailywire.com/news/49945/she-verbally-consented-sex-school-determined-he-ashe-schow have you all seen this?
@Holo "I waved the flag thousands of time's, but, everyone saw the ice berg. But the captain ignored me and kept going for that iceberg."
This is the EU's final flag and it's about to head towards that iceberg. Get out whilst you can.
@C_Nile yes but, where's the debate ... I mean... Come in , drop the video but ask us questions so we can tell you if we agree or not.
I just don't think you want to know what I think. Hence the reason why you just come here and drop - the bomb and run.
@TEABAG!!! *confused American noises*
@Holo it's like if Mexico had a deal with south America to flood America with refugees .... Your reaction is ?
@TEABAG!!! joking aside what i meant was, i'm american, why are you telling me to get out of the EU lol, you guys can keep that globalist crap to yourselves
@Holo no the flag of warning that the EU is sinking. You need to work on your metaphors. Because everyone knows the Titanic sank from an Iceberg.
```"I waved the flag thousands of time's, but, everyone saw the ice berg. But the captain ignored me and kept going for that iceberg."
This is the EU's final flag and it's about to head towards that iceberg. Get out whilst you can.``` I understand the titanic reference, which, btw is false, cause it was actually the dereliction of duty by the spotter that caused the wreck, but that's neither here nor there, you stated 'get out whilst you can'
No actually
It was the lack of binoculars
Too dark to see it before it was too late
apparently it was a number of reasons https://www.history.com/news/why-did-the-titanic-sink
Binoculars wouldn't have saved the Titanic.
Standard practice at the time was for lookouts only to use binoculars to focus in on an object already spotted. Looking 'round at night, they still would've used the Mk. I eyeball, and even then, the conditions of the North Atlantic in that region are ripe for what's known as "cold mirages." Thus, they wouldn't have seen the 'berg even with binoculars.
Didn't the titanic also have a major design flaw too? That being the water tight baffles that run throughout a ship? In the case of a puncture, a ship is still able to remain afloat due to each baffle being completely water tight and even with one willing the ship is still buoyant enough to remain afloat. However, the titanic wasn't watertight as above each baffle, it wasn't a solid roof and the water just kept filling the hull.
yeah IIRC
The watertight bulkheads only went as high as E Deck, yes. Thus, as she sank, the water cascaded over the top of the forward bulkheads, dooming the ship. Of course, no matter the situation, the ideal option is to NOT run into anything. As Aristotle so rightly put it: "A collision at sea will ruin your entire day."
the ideal option might have been to go head on into it