Message from @GalaxyBrainer

Discord ID: 621324926691049502

2019-09-11 11:28:51 UTC  

extremely. again, this is known

2019-09-11 11:29:07 UTC  

I know it's usually best to assume incompetence over malice, but that's so many levels of fail

2019-09-11 11:29:38 UTC  

like the only thing these people are actually competent at are being the mafia

2019-09-11 11:29:42 UTC  

that's it

2019-09-11 11:29:52 UTC  

TR also exposed them good a while back

2019-09-11 11:30:45 UTC  

I guess it's a classic example of don't stop your enemy from making a mistake

2019-09-11 11:38:56 UTC  

BBC is 140 % objective what are you talking about <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

2019-09-11 12:38:41 UTC  

I mean, the BBC is fine <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-09-11 12:38:55 UTC  

OFC when they start talking about things you don't like, then BBC MAN BAD!

2019-09-11 12:40:17 UTC  

How is any of this incorrect?

2019-09-11 12:40:21 UTC  

Or opinion pieces?

2019-09-11 12:40:25 UTC  

It's objective fact.

2019-09-11 12:40:43 UTC  

Even this, isn't written in a negative way

2019-09-11 12:40:52 UTC  

"No-deal Brexit: 10 ways it **could** affect you"

2019-09-11 12:41:01 UTC  

"The contents of your shopping basket **may** change"

2019-09-11 12:41:17 UTC  

"And Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said that, in a worst-case scenario, our shopping bills **could** increase by 10%. "

2019-09-11 12:41:29 UTC  

Nowhere do they say they WILL. They say they COULD.

2019-09-11 12:41:59 UTC  
2019-09-11 12:43:26 UTC  


2019-09-11 12:43:39 UTC  

Can you show me where the BBC isn't objective?

2019-09-11 12:43:48 UTC  

Or posting factual information?

2019-09-11 12:48:32 UTC  

here's a pretty cool example of a non-objective article

see all the slanting and fanciful wording? sure, everything written here is true when you look at it... but it's written fairly disingenuously, don't you think? it's also interesting how all of their quotes are from people opposed to the topic in question. no pro- or even neutral parties

2019-09-11 12:48:40 UTC  

you can still be factual and objective and show insane bias

2019-09-11 12:48:45 UTC  

or are you a stupid retard?

2019-09-11 12:48:53 UTC

2019-09-11 12:49:07 UTC

2019-09-11 12:49:18 UTC  

Sec, let me finish eating

2019-09-11 12:49:23 UTC  

it is a pretty volcano take

2019-09-11 12:50:56 UTC  

factual, objective articles devoid of differing perspective is opinion, isn't it?

2019-09-11 12:52:39 UTC  

and then there's also omission

2019-09-11 12:52:47 UTC  

>not even listed as “opinion”

2019-09-11 12:52:49 UTC  


2019-09-11 12:53:18 UTC  

Just read through the article, what's wrong with it? @GalaxyBrainer

2019-09-11 12:53:27 UTC  

"A YouTuber-turned-UKIP candidate who said he "wouldn't even rape" a female Labour MP has refused to apologise."

2019-09-11 12:53:28 UTC  


2019-09-11 12:53:35 UTC  

"Speaking at the weekend, UKIP's leader Gerrard Batten said Mr Benjamin's comments were made in satire."

2019-09-11 12:53:36 UTC  


2019-09-11 12:54:10 UTC  

"I'm not going to apologise for my crimes against political correctness, I hate political correctness," he said.

2019-09-11 12:54:10 UTC