Message from @Gray__Fox
Discord ID: 614702819043180545
I'd rather fite you over your use of woo.
woo
uwu
awoo
0w0
i think i have a way to cause the guardian to have an apoplectic fit. all we need to do is get boris to suggest that voting rights should be suspended while someone is not contributing taxes
Kek.
The absolute madlad. He might actually go for it.
But the basic point I'm making, is that, comparing systems, even while Starship Troopers can be argued superior to the system we have now, it's success is still chiefly subject to the kind of people who operate within it. For instance, it's still possible to gain the system to stack votes, by bloating public service sectors in order to justify an expanding demos, and leveraging the loyalty of those new employees to the official who created their jobs.
We can see examples of this in the US currently, as certain public sector employees represent a considerable lobby, obstructing efficiency and cost reform.
Also, I would argue a nation of laws and not men is impossible. Laws require men. Unless you're arguing for everything to be run by some autonomous self-creating AI. While some men are more, or less, interested in enforcing objective, impartial laws, the results are nevertheless a consequence of those men.
No more "OwO"ing it's disgusting, and you are a pervert.
>posting memes in the political discussion chat
"We don't like your kind here, feller"
the memes must flow
Shapiro makes me love the left by praising, I mean fellating dead Koch brother's corpse on air: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQvX1CrNKOo
With friends like this, who needs enemies? (Fucking kike.)
The future is racial
too high of socioeconomic mobility is a bad thing
it disrupts the formation of families
What does that mean, "too high" socio-economic mobility? What's "too high"? And why does it disrupt families?
On why the Founders were not bluepilled Classical Liberals but Ethnonationalists
it disrupts the formation of families because socioeconomic status is a very important part of finding a mate as a man
higher socioeconomic mobility generally means that the formation of families will be put off for longer
Or maybe people who are good at moving up are bad at forming families.
Sounds like both to me.
You're both right.
No reason only one of you is.
@Monstrous Moonshine Liberalism but for huwhites only
Liberalism is a cancer destroying our society. It is the reason Europe is becoming increasingly multicultural. It must be eradicated and replaced with something better.
Liberalism is the reason why Europe boomed, you nonce.
how
Liberalism is the key to progression
Traditionalism is antithetical to that aim