When it comes to short-term destruction, they're pretty impressive weapons that humans have created

an 'air blast' is a typical military deployment of a nuclear weapon that yields the most damage per kiloton/warhead

If you'd nuke the sun it would not even register on any devices

No shit lmao

China and India are the biggest causes of climate changes

Ironically, GHG can do more damage than nukes

And they're not going to change shit

Kind of hard to compete with a self-sustaining nuclear furnace

as we have seen, a nuclear detonation in space does little aside from EM effects

SUn is itself an ongoing nuke

Just a fusion nuke

Not fission

I just had a bunch of furries get really upset because I wanted to know why harnesses weren't sexual x3

because there is no blast medium to displace

A nuke in space is just a dirty explosion

?

Nuclear winter will therefore not do shit

Don't nuke the Sun, Son 🌞

A nuke is space causes issues back here on land

@JackH670 fun though!

Rather serious ones, actually.

Harnesses are not sexy

Tfw 2012 avengers actually got the explosion of a space nuke right

'dirty' is the term for just distributing radioactive material

Hey, just be glad we've put some hard brakes on biological weapons... as far as we know.

but an explosion isn't 'dirty'

Space nukes are unhindered

By air n shit

Yeah a nuke still shits out radiation

Should clarify

Ionising radiation

yeah, but that is all; no blast medium to displace

A nuke in space can cause electronics to fry on land

*ionizing

Fucking brit

Oi

Brit English is the only correct kind

There's literally a mathematical model based on energy mass conversion which denotes the amount of anticipated energy mass being released, the anticipated overpressure resultant and the radius of the effect.

@Mikey correction, in the ionosphere

a nuke in space is equivalant to a CME

It was before you returned home and changed it to not sound like the colonials.