Message from @Ethaneth

Discord ID: 642190376811102213


2019-11-08 00:26:34 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-11-08 00:26:54 UTC  

#sustainableIdeas

2019-11-08 01:06:34 UTC  

Imagine guzzling EU's cum as much as Weez does.

2019-11-08 01:12:16 UTC  
2019-11-08 01:14:27 UTC  

Too bad. Democrats tried but now this will blow up in their faces.

2019-11-08 02:30:24 UTC  

This will backfire. And the Democrats will probably spend in whole billion dollars on investigating trump

2019-11-08 02:31:00 UTC  

Democrats better have a really good pr. Because 2024 might look like a Republican win

2019-11-08 02:31:44 UTC  

Rolling stone

2019-11-08 02:31:46 UTC  

CNN

2019-11-08 02:31:49 UTC  

Slate

2019-11-08 02:32:44 UTC  

I hope when labor takes over and you have blackouts in the winter you still have enough brain cells to rub together for the warmth @Nathan James 123

2019-11-08 02:33:10 UTC  

Imagine unironically citing those as legitimate sources what the flying fuck xD

2019-11-08 02:33:50 UTC  

what's wrong with rolling stone?

2019-11-08 02:33:52 UTC  

Weez is European, doubt he's even from the UK.

2019-11-08 02:34:28 UTC  

Probably some literal-who EU country that wants the UK to stay so they can pay for his taxes.

2019-11-08 02:34:57 UTC  

I think he mentioned norway or some place

2019-11-08 02:35:17 UTC  

There we go.

2019-11-08 04:29:25 UTC  

@Jokerfaic did you srsly just ask me what was wrong with quoting the rolling stone as a legitinate source of information?

2019-11-08 04:32:54 UTC  

The rolling stone is the tyt of magazines

2019-11-08 04:33:22 UTC  

Semi-sentient parrots that mindlessly vomit whatever talking points they were programmed with that morning

2019-11-08 04:42:49 UTC  

they ran the UVA rape hoax a few years back didn't they? "the Jackie story"?

2019-11-08 04:52:59 UTC  

Yup

2019-11-08 04:53:19 UTC  

Rape apologetics for all the diversity imports in Europe

2019-11-08 04:53:28 UTC  

Russia hoax

2019-11-08 04:53:59 UTC  

The list goes on

2019-11-08 10:41:36 UTC  

Good NPC, just look at the names of the establishments that wrote the articles, don’t actually read the stories; ignore the evidence they provide. Good little NPC.

“BIASED SOURCES!” <:npc:502497359419408384>

“YOU CAN’T CITE THOSE, EVEN THOUGH THEY PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE, I DON’T LIKE WHAT THEY’RE SAYING!” <:npc:502497359419408384>

“EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NOTHING FACTUALLY WRONG WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, I DO NOT LIKE THE SOURCE IT CAME FROM SO I’M GOING TO IGNORE IT ALL! YES I KNOW THEY’RE REPORTING HARD FACTS THAT I CAN CHECK AT SNY POINT, BUT THEY’RE SAYING MEAN THINGS AND I DON’T LIKE THAT! THE SOURCE IS BAD!” <:npc:502497359419408384>

2019-11-08 10:42:29 UTC  

I was surprised that dems tried to impeach 5 of the last 6 rep. presidents, but also I was not so surprised.

2019-11-08 10:57:09 UTC  

As I did not know this, I'm now having the same reaction

2019-11-08 12:33:34 UTC  

Yea, someone claimed that they tried to impeach all republican presidents since Eisenhower. Couldn't escape the ever dutiful snopes, no sir. Mostly false: it was _merely_ 5 of the 6 republican presidents, not _all_ of them.

2019-11-08 13:25:02 UTC  

Gotta love snopes

2019-11-08 13:25:25 UTC  

*Mostly false*

"This claim is 10 % incorrect"

2019-11-08 13:36:05 UTC  

Did any of you guys see E;R's Wokeman review?

2019-11-08 13:36:15 UTC  

ye

2019-11-08 13:36:22 UTC  

Every Time