Hm, I honestly believe we as a society are too pussy sometimes.
I don't like how "muh morals" will stop us from doing certain "inhumane" experiments that will benefit the society as a whole

@Deleted User the only thing I was able to find remotely close to what you said on the banks, was from pol and was a series of books that tried to claim even Hitlol got funded by them. However even their claim was shaky and on the source said the goal was to hope Russia would collapse from it. @National Trotskyist was the one who linked me that initially.

>As for the "i cant find anything on it" Lol, So lets say this group literally owns ever media you use for information?

This still just goes around in circles, where its highly convenient that you and only you seem to know the truth about this topic you brought up. Like I said nothing comes up and if it does come up its in a contest to see how many buzzwords it fit into the title, mostly with the word Mason tacked on.

deus ex

Basically

God of rape

agios o tavern

https://discord.gg/dfnSMJv

@DOLBATIC It isnt a fallacy, it is true that the search directory is controlled by the same fainacial intrest

why would they not withhold and purge this kind of information when they purge so much other things not even related to them

And it isnt t a fallacy as you could actaully do indipendent reasearch, but ou only use the mainstream information source so ,,,,

why should i trust you

you shouldnt

so i wont

@(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥ russia did collapse

After 80 years...

and not without opposition from its own citizens

was the amazon rainforest man made @Deleted User

@(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥ nigger there was a regime change

russia fell

Not just that

but wtf really

Are you dense?

you even cnodidering the eecconomics of the collectivisation effords

it was so fucked for the ppl they ran out of food

No you are dense

They wanted Russia to fall right away, the 80 years later was unrelated to the aforementioned.

ecconomics is not just stock pruces

So you are indeed dense.

No not 80 years later

are you even reading what i said

collectivisation was part of tone of the first plans

it caused starvation which is ecconomic decline

millions of ppl starved

almost every one list their pruvate farms

So into a new topic. So they lacked so much food they were able to win a world war, and fight several other proxy wars with a sustainable population?

ecconomic structures cuased distribution of food to fail causing many starvations

Wining a world war or not is strawmen

like it has nothing to do wuth what i djust said

>Wining a world war or not is strawmen

That's literally not what a strawman even is.

Strawmen is when i put words into your mouth.