Message from @(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥
Discord ID: 604075963386429440
@DOLBATIC It isnt a fallacy, it is true that the search directory is controlled by the same fainacial intrest
why would they not withhold and purge this kind of information when they purge so much other things not even related to them
And it isnt t a fallacy as you could actaully do indipendent reasearch, but ou only use the mainstream information source so ,,,,
why should i trust you
you shouldnt
so i wont
@(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥ russia did collapse
was the amazon rainforest man made @Deleted User
@(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥ nigger there was a regime change
russia fell
Not just that
but wtf really
Are you dense?
you even cnodidering the eecconomics of the collectivisation effords
it was so fucked for the ppl they ran out of food
No you are dense
They wanted Russia to fall right away, the 80 years later was unrelated to the aforementioned.
ecconomics is not just stock pruces
No not 80 years later
are you even reading what i said
collectivisation was part of tone of the first plans
it caused starvation which is ecconomic decline
millions of ppl starved
almost every one list their pruvate farms
So into a new topic. So they lacked so much food they were able to win a world war, and fight several other proxy wars with a sustainable population?
ecconomic structures cuased distribution of food to fail causing many starvations
Wining a world war or not is strawmen
like it has nothing to do wuth what i djust said
>Wining a world war or not is strawmen
That's literally not what a strawman even is.
Strawmen is when i put words into your mouth.
Please at least learn your logical fallacies.
let me correct
But my point still stands.
using winning a war as strawmen to the ecconomics not being effected by the regime change is retarded
They at the same time were starving, but also fought off a European Empire under the control of Germany.
How is that a point
How is that relating to ecconomics being effected in other ereas