Гуднайт

I've studied diamat this weekend. Total fucking waste of time.

Dialectic materialism is, in essence, just like Wordpress theme development.

With about the same cognitive demand

@Firefly Kek, you got kicked

@Deleted User again? Oh no.

From leninist front

thats what happens when you harass people with rape you piece of scum

@aleks you are still welcome here.

i'm leaving anyway, i do not want to be affiliated with you in anyway. you're a sorry excuse for a communist

good riddance

Hope you come back. Good luck.

lol

i love your sarcasm

@Firefly Didn't Russia look more like an anarchist federation (with councils) than people with an unified party? I think this breaks the myth that we need a strong leader and party to get the power. Also, didn't Stalin want democratic reforms like pulling the new constitution?

TIL the USSR was an anarchist federation with non anarchist characteristics

@Firefly what happened? kek

@Prometheus They had assemblies with Lenin yes

This is wanted by anarchists

But pro-Stalin people, and Lenin too considered the ban on factions, as it was needed

seems that Stalin wasn't be able to restore a complete democratic reform

im slowly disaccociating myself with anarchism

and I criticize this, I think we need to go this way directly

Marxism Leninism is state capitalism

Once the bourgeoise are eliminnated the evil party becomes the new ruling class

trust me i've totally done an indepth materialist marxist analysis to come to this conclusion

lol

I wouldn't say evil

DAMN UKRAINIANS

but if they're disconnected from the people, how could you prevent revisionism in the next generation?

Context is key. How and why did this disconnect come about? In the USSR it's mostly due to WW2 related reasons in China because of post-feudal reasons dank

i need to go and buy congolese slaves now brb

yes, and after going that path we can't know for sure if the leaders will drop socialism or not; the people need blind faith, we don't know if there would be a Stalin or a Khruschev

I think we should keep this sacred as possible, how can we know at this point that the party is lying to keep in power or not?

There was never a Stalin or a Kruschev, but anyone who disagreed was removed, so, from the perspective of materialism, there was.

Which is why these purely phenomenological descriptions are ... cancer.

I get why it's attractive. The western mindset ought to react to current year politics as though besieged.

Some are willing to sharpen the knives and gather the resources.

@OF-8 How much do they pay you?

how can a planned economy and a restoration of capitalism be the same?

whoever claims to mark the USSR as capitalist because of the five year plan is completely reactionary