Message from @mungojelly

Discord ID: 330674656858341376


2017-07-01 11:38:52 UTC  

they're built by their employees

2017-07-01 11:38:57 UTC  

thats not true

2017-07-01 11:38:57 UTC  

notice that managers are also employees

2017-07-01 11:39:02 UTC  

owners literally don't do shit

2017-07-01 11:39:27 UTC  

I worked in a factory that was owned by a guy who started his business selling fruit out the back of his truck

2017-07-01 11:39:38 UTC  

and now he produces all the fruit bars and snacks in the country

2017-07-01 11:39:52 UTC  

he built that

2017-07-01 11:40:15 UTC  

another boss of mine ran a rental cabin business and he built every one of the cabins himself

2017-07-01 11:40:20 UTC  

and hes a millionaire now

2017-07-01 11:40:35 UTC  

so if ownership were to be assigned to someone else, would that be unfair

2017-07-01 11:40:43 UTC  

because then he wouldn't be compensated for all that work

2017-07-01 11:40:55 UTC  

if someone other than him were the owner, that would be unfair, huh?

2017-07-01 11:40:59 UTC  

thats what buyouts and mergers are, compensation

2017-07-01 11:41:08 UTC  

they should make the owner be whoever did the most work to make the company, huh

2017-07-01 11:41:21 UTC  

they dont seize their means of production, they pay them what their business is worth, which is usually int he tens of millions

2017-07-01 11:41:45 UTC  

so some unskilled labourer who walks in off the street should just get the company?

2017-07-01 11:42:14 UTC  

no whoever does the work to make the company

2017-07-01 11:42:36 UTC  

so the person who owns the company?

2017-07-01 11:42:38 UTC  

not who technically owns the resources needed

2017-07-01 11:42:44 UTC  

its like you're trying to fix something that isnt broken

2017-07-01 11:43:01 UTC  

i'm explaining to you in your own terms but you still don't understand

2017-07-01 11:43:10 UTC  

you think he deserves the company because he worked hard

2017-07-01 11:43:17 UTC  

what if someone else technically owned the food truck at first

2017-07-01 11:43:22 UTC  

no he owns it because it was his to begin with

2017-07-01 11:43:27 UTC  

then should all that hard work mean he just gets a minimal payment and no ownership

2017-07-01 11:43:29 UTC  

it's the same work

2017-07-01 11:43:39 UTC  

no because that would be stealing

2017-07-01 11:43:46 UTC  

which is what you're proposing

2017-07-01 11:43:48 UTC  

it's just a different set of rules

2017-07-01 11:43:56 UTC  

it's not "stealing" because it's not violating the rules

2017-07-01 11:43:59 UTC  

it's a different set of rules

2017-07-01 11:44:09 UTC  

where what you said should happen happens

2017-07-01 11:44:20 UTC  

people who work hard building businesses, get to share in the profit of those businsesses

2017-07-01 11:44:24 UTC  

i'm saying that should be the rule

2017-07-01 11:44:29 UTC  

generally it's now the exception

2017-07-01 11:45:25 UTC  

so you're saying if someone works at a company for a long time, and works hard, they should get a proportional share of the profits?

2017-07-01 11:45:51 UTC  

yeh, the same thing you just said

2017-07-01 11:46:05 UTC  

right, thats what I thought you believed

2017-07-01 11:46:10 UTC  

you said how awesome it was that someone's work resulted in them having control and sharing in profit

2017-07-01 11:46:11 UTC  

now let me explain to you why thats bullshit

2017-07-01 11:46:35 UTC  

but that's not how it actually works in this society-- actually owners can invest in stock and put in no work at all