Message from @Firefly
Discord ID: 331579964069511169
But that's the inner social democrat talking
maybe you can argue that it is possible to avoid violent revolution, but the vast majority of socialism and history disagrees
It certainly isn't socialisic, perhaps that's the reason it works ;d
it very much is the reason it works today
socialism has no chance of surviving in a sea of capitalist countries
Well, USSR was dismantled because it was not authoritarian and/or communist anymore. So it can
>So it can
Can what?
survive?
can go from authoriatarianism to democracyt
I thin
@Deleted User change
@Deleted User change
In fact it always did change
You mean that USSR became less dictatorial that's why it collapsed?
@Deleted User both less authoritarian and less communist.
Ok but it is very frustrating to hear that, in what possible scenario does that work
In every scenario there is change.
sure
for better or worse, history is changing
regimes change
I wish
Everything change
Sure
But
What does that support
That doesn't mean everything is possible
You doubt something can change
I oppose it
Nope
You said that change exists
I agree
>I genuinely believe that it virtually can't go past authoritarianism
The specific system yeah
It always does. And in fact did
perhaps I should add "and work"
Perhaps
I wish there was an example of classless, stateless, moneyless etc sosciety
But it never goes there
there is if you look far enough back
I think all intellectuals, no matter where they are on the spectrum, the somehow trivialize reality, that it's far more complex and multivariable and dynamic