Message from @MrSally
Discord ID: 343200033816182787
Get on voice guys
Get on Anti Fascist voice niggas
I'd say Natsocs
get on voice
But that's a discussion for another day, I am going to bed
yo
@Deleted User You suck, Chopin.
❤
Schubert owns you.
Blasphemy.
Actually Lizst > both.
I prefer Bri'ish English tbh
We are taught it in European schools
communism is Famine ism
**Hello Comrades. This general is for the discussion of Marxism-Leninism, the ideology of revolutionary socialism and communism.
Communism is the next stage of humanity following the capitalist stage.
What exactly is communism according to Marxist-Leninists:
**
A brief hypothetical dialogue on Leftist support for third-world invasion and also environmentalism:
Leftist: The world is over-populated, we're using up all of the earth's resources, we need to have fewer babies!
I: Most of the babies are born in Asia and Africa, why don't we support reducing the birth-rate there?
L: People in the West use much more water, land, electricity, etc with our houses and cars and computers than people in the third world.
I: Does that mean anyone who lives in a Western country places a greater strain on the planet?
L: Yes.
I: And people in the West who have lots of children do the greatest environmental damage?
L: Yes.
I: And the people with the highest birthrate are in Africa and Asia.
L: Yes, but they don't use up as much by way of resources.
I: So why are bringing them here? Won't they do a lot more environmental damage once they have houses and cars and electricity 24/7?
Yes, but that's not a good argument for why we shouldn't "bring them" here.
It's still just racist in its underpinnings.
it's logical
Let the immigrants come.
Bring them to us.
look further into it than just the surface
That's what I did buddy.
no you just brushed it off as pure ideology
You just described my entire process.
No, I looked at the ideological core of it.
Racism.
Not an argument against immigration.
>implying there is only racism
>no logic
you're lost
you don't want to see the logic behind it
The ideology behind that argument is racism.
you instantly dismiss it on the basis of racism
The logic is racist logic.
Not actual logic.
you could argue it's positive to a racist platform