Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 355913306093125633


2017-09-08 06:18:09 UTC  

hory shet

2017-09-08 09:08:27 UTC  

✊🏿 ✊🏾 ✊🏽 ✊🏼 ✊🏻

2017-09-08 18:42:50 UTC  

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Ollie#9236 was banned!***

2017-09-08 18:44:23 UTC  

Hi

2017-09-08 18:47:39 UTC  

Hello

2017-09-08 22:10:31 UTC  
2017-09-09 00:32:03 UTC  

I want the world to explode and my dick to grow

2017-09-09 01:37:35 UTC  

is everyone here an unironical commie

2017-09-09 01:56:17 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308995540782284817/355894147221291010/14861431648320.jpg

2017-09-09 01:58:43 UTC  
2017-09-09 02:04:59 UTC  

Marxism is hard.

2017-09-09 02:19:13 UTC  

There's a reason why dumb people like me are right wingers.

2017-09-09 02:27:47 UTC  

>Right-wing

2017-09-09 02:27:49 UTC  

🤢

2017-09-09 02:29:16 UTC  

Private property = right wing.

2017-09-09 02:46:02 UTC  

@Deleted User Any private property, anywhere, anywhen, is wrong?

2017-09-09 02:46:21 UTC  

*right-wing

2017-09-09 02:49:21 UTC  

I mean, yeah, if private property or defence of it is apart of your ideology, that's right wing. Why do you disagree with this definition? What is a better one?

2017-09-09 03:07:47 UTC  
2017-09-09 03:12:24 UTC  

@Deleted User I thought that you were a fucking egoist.

2017-09-09 03:13:18 UTC  

Yeah, what's your point?

2017-09-09 03:14:29 UTC  

I thought that egoism was inheriently anti-marxist, since it allows for private property to exist in an uncontrolled scale?

2017-09-09 03:15:17 UTC  

All property is a spook. It is defacto left wing.

2017-09-09 03:16:56 UTC  

Also I don't have to follow Stirner exactly. Stirnerism is for Stirner.

2017-09-09 03:20:26 UTC  

Private property just doesn't *feel* right. It is too uptight. I am just as likely to destroy *my* property as someone elses.

2017-09-09 03:21:57 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308995540782284817/355915707382497291/20768061_337497266703404_6153252160184988682_n.jpg

2017-09-09 03:22:37 UTC  

Cool self-portrait.

2017-09-09 03:23:51 UTC  

@Deleted User >He is worried about destroying his and other peoples property
Consequences are a spook.

2017-09-09 03:24:56 UTC  

I am not worried at all. I am just saying that I have no special attachment to this or that objects. 'Property' is all the same, 'property' doesn't exist.

2017-09-09 03:27:33 UTC  

'Property' destruction is fun. Primarily because people attach themselves to it and are frustrated by its removal.

2017-09-09 03:28:15 UTC  

Me? I don't care. Burn it all down. I would have lost nothing.

2017-09-09 03:28:50 UTC  

I want to see that tested.

2017-09-09 03:29:26 UTC  

If you really do not care, then why not burn down your own house?

2017-09-09 03:30:32 UTC  

Two main reasons. I'm neutral about it. It would be an inconvenience.

2017-09-09 03:31:02 UTC  

Consequences are spook

2017-09-09 03:31:25 UTC  

You said yourself that you hate all property, so why would it be an inconvienence to you now if you hate it all?

2017-09-09 03:31:47 UTC  

I didn't say I hate property. I said I don't believe in it. The physical existance of objects is still real.

2017-09-09 03:32:11 UTC  

It takes work to burn things down. I need motivation.

2017-09-09 03:32:55 UTC  

The revolution won't start itself, so go ahead and burn that couch.

2017-09-09 03:33:24 UTC  

Revolution? What revolution? Doesn't seem likely.