Message from @Bravos
Discord ID: 544584477473767454
before christianity being faithful was still core to our culture as well as letting kids be kids
yeah, we shouldn't encourage sleeping around but it's not morally wrong neither if it's in order to find a life partner
but todays culture is degenerate, but that is due to the circumstances in finding a partner and how todays values are wrong
I think that men and women will naturally create a system that has to be mutually beneficial without the government rigging it in one gender's favor
Society at large will determine whether or not they will tolerate promiscuity
Once the government cannot bail out women that have been foolish
the jews created feminism and it's part of cultural marxism, so it's just a way to break down the natural order and stability of the society they want to reshape
the people don't always know what's best for them
or else direct democracy or something like that would be the way to go
we are open to the people making choices in some questions whether the state has to decide what's best for the people as a whole in other questions
eventually when the culture and genetics are healthy enough it will become an organic state
still hierarchical, not some socialist thing
In regards to what women will want long term and men will want long term for their family lives that will have to be satisfied voluntarily between the two of them.
Crying foul after using your sexuality and asking the government to bail you out will enforce behaviors that are toxic to society.
I agree that if the state prioritizes the race above anything else then it will probably result in policies that benefit the healthy and smart, while punishing the dumb and weak
I guess so, you can't and I don't see any benefit from micro managing people like that
Yeah, otherwise it would be central planning to the point of mismanaging your capital - in this case your human capital.
we're not anti individuals or individual differences
but maybe anti individualism if you see that as a philosophy or political stance or how you would classify it
I would probably say that individualism in a system that is run by destroyers will result in individuals benefiting themselves at the destruction of their people
Which is what we have today.
In a system that is run by protectors and sustainers, then people who wish to benefit themselves will act in a way that strengthens their people.
anyway you need to be able to sacrifice your own beliefs, wills and wants for the race or people as a whole to be able to cooperate effectively
you don't have to abandon them, but everyone can not pull the rope in their own direction
From everything I have observed, I know that the majority of people respond to incentives. They might feel strongly about something but are too lazy or cowardly to sacrifice for it. That's why the system has to incentivize people artificially.
yeah, it's about being taught correctly mostly
Yeah, the education is compromised as well.
Germany was never as USSR
people were happy and did these things voluntarily because they would benefit from it
I don't think that people need the truth, they need to be indoctrinated.
We need loyalty.
I don't know, why can't they be the same
indoctrinate people with the truth
Either way they won't be learning how to think critically
Which gives them the inability to disagree with the status quo
Whether it is the truth or not
As long as it results in action that benefits the race
and as many individuals within the race as possible
just give them healthy ideals