Message from @Bravos

Discord ID: 544586745291866133

2019-02-11 18:24:04 UTC  

but maybe anti individualism if you see that as a philosophy or political stance or how you would classify it

2019-02-11 18:24:17 UTC  


2019-02-11 18:25:12 UTC  

I would probably say that individualism in a system that is run by destroyers will result in individuals benefiting themselves at the destruction of their people

2019-02-11 18:25:40 UTC  

Which is what we have today.

2019-02-11 18:26:35 UTC  

In a system that is run by protectors and sustainers, then people who wish to benefit themselves will act in a way that strengthens their people.

2019-02-11 18:26:52 UTC  

anyway you need to be able to sacrifice your own beliefs, wills and wants for the race or people as a whole to be able to cooperate effectively

2019-02-11 18:27:24 UTC  

you don't have to abandon them, but everyone can not pull the rope in their own direction

2019-02-11 18:28:55 UTC  

From everything I have observed, I know that the majority of people respond to incentives. They might feel strongly about something but are too lazy or cowardly to sacrifice for it. That's why the system has to incentivize people artificially.

2019-02-11 18:29:21 UTC  

yeah, it's about being taught correctly mostly

2019-02-11 18:29:46 UTC  

Yeah, the education is compromised as well.

2019-02-11 18:29:57 UTC  

Germany was never as USSR

2019-02-11 18:30:21 UTC  

people were happy and did these things voluntarily because they would benefit from it

2019-02-11 18:30:27 UTC  

I don't think that people need the truth, they need to be indoctrinated.

2019-02-11 18:30:47 UTC  

We need loyalty.

2019-02-11 18:31:12 UTC  

I don't know, why can't they be the same

2019-02-11 18:31:27 UTC  

indoctrinate people with the truth

2019-02-11 18:31:49 UTC  

Either way they won't be learning how to think critically

2019-02-11 18:32:04 UTC  

Which gives them the inability to disagree with the status quo

2019-02-11 18:32:16 UTC  

Whether it is the truth or not

2019-02-11 18:32:55 UTC  

As long as it results in action that benefits the race

2019-02-11 18:33:18 UTC  

and as many individuals within the race as possible

2019-02-11 18:34:20 UTC  

just give them healthy ideals

2019-02-11 18:34:26 UTC  

and it will sort itself out

2019-02-11 18:34:56 UTC  

they can be critical but of what?

2019-02-11 18:35:11 UTC  

our state isn't what MSM portrays the third reich as

2019-02-11 18:36:16 UTC  

instigators might not be so appreciated, but it all depends on what the motives behind it is and so on

2019-02-11 18:37:42 UTC  

Right, I think as long as no subversion of the education system or media is allowed to happen then healthy disagreement can be had.

2019-02-11 18:38:32 UTC  

I'm wary of egalitarian thought.

2019-02-11 18:38:43 UTC  

It spreads like a disease.

2019-02-11 18:40:10 UTC  

yeah, but that wouldn't be a problem

2019-02-11 18:40:16 UTC  

we wouldn't allow that

2019-02-11 18:40:28 UTC  

you know that it's the jews that cause that

2019-02-11 18:40:57 UTC  

and anyone who would do that would be a traitor or enemy of the people anyway

2019-02-11 18:42:55 UTC  

I think if White people can be main proponents of egalitarianism they can still subvert.
If Jews ever were out of the picture, there would still be subversive intelligent people.

2019-02-11 18:44:02 UTC  

They just wouldn't be able to work in concerted effort for years because of the lack of tribal bindings and differences that can keep them polarized against the host nation.

2019-02-11 19:12:29 UTC  

a few of course, but they are easy to take care of

2019-02-11 20:45:07 UTC  

Maybe White people are more controllable . . . They are smart, but orderly.

2019-02-11 22:05:51 UTC  

and we have more sympathy

2019-02-11 22:06:01 UTC  

we don't act like pests

2019-02-11 22:19:04 UTC  


2019-02-11 22:19:28 UTC  

I think an interesting question is the final solution to the JQ