if immigrants who has a university degree should be let in no matter what, then it becomes "anyone has graduated from a college in the world can become us citizens"

@Huge Brain Oliver Imo the best way to argue for lower immigration is to promote high skill immigration instead of low skill immigration. You have to consider our interests and politics of immigration as it stands currently.

More wealthy immigrants are less likely to have replacement level birthrates. So the indian guy who comes here on an H1-B visa is less likely to have a kid than a Mexican coming here through and H2-B visa or coming in illegally.

If we were to put our support behind things like the RAISE Act (https://www.cotton.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=765) we would be able to cut immigration levels in half, and be able to mitigate the effects of demographic replacement of whites, while at the same time protecting white blue collar workers from a loose labor market

yes raise act

I mean high quality immigrants still have assimilation problem and we cannot have too many

if it gets to the point where our doctors are getting replaced by foreign doctors that's a problem that is BIGGER than anyone taking a lowskilled labor job

the law should let people in based off of demand for people for whatever sector, they have predictons for which sectors are going to grow and which ones arent. They can also forsee a need for more people in x field, as we see now in a demand for computer science and eldery care

@🎭🎵 You have to understand this though, there's always going to be a high demand for foreign labor if that labor is cheaper than the native alternative. Like with H2-B's for instance, there isn't a massive shortage of labor supply in the H2-B sector, yet there is such a high demand. The reason why? Nine of the top 10 sectors occupied by H2-B workers have had stagnant or declining wages for the past two decades

I'd also argue that low skill natives being replaced and having their wages fall is the worst thing that can happen, low skill workers are generally low income earners as well. If you take away their source of income or diminish it, you're hurting people who need it the most. As opposed to a middle or upper class white collar worker who has a fairly good income

a limited amount is ok but importing a master class will be worse

especially many newcoming investement bankers, doctors, silicon valley elites, media personals have more allegience to their own tribe/country of origin than America

not only economy matters

I agree, my end goal is to end immigration entirely, but you have to cut the branches before you cut the whole tree.

Immigrants of all classes have allegiance to their own group, it's just low skill immigrants who have more children, i.e. creating more democrat voters.

We could have a payment-based soft eugenics program to breed more high-IQ whites to serve those roles.

Get rid of the visa program

smh

cmon fella

people are having to retrain their replacements

its horrible

@Gregory Malchuk An open eugenics program in the United States is highly unrealistic, the public still associates anything with eugenics to nazism

@🎭🎵 I'm for cutting immigration worker programs as much as possible, at the current rate though we take in around 1.3 million immigrants a year. Only 1 in 15 are here because of their skills, it's better to take in high skill immigrants with low birth rates than to take in low skill ones with high birth rates

SOFT eugenics. Like child payments scaled based on the IQ of the parents.

@Gregory Malchuk You really think government officials would allow that though? You've gotta have your policies grounded in reality here.

It is aspirational. A longer term goal.

immigration law should be based on a fliexible set of rules instead of something set it stone

which I mean it kinda is, I just dont like the idea of a bill not adapting to changing times

if the bill says to take in doctors 10 years before and now our doctors are getting displaced we should be able to retweak who we let in withoutr having to pass a bill through congress

which I think is already the case consitutionally it just isnt done

boys, obviously we know trump being “mentally unstable” is a meme (stable genius). but my boss, chairman of state republican party, was at white house for christmas dinner and was waiting in large mob of people to say hello to the president. when he finally got up there my boss introduced himself and trump immediately recalled the names of each senator in my state and governor that was up for re-election this year and was genuinely interested in how they’re looking. he also offered to fly out and have a rally here on behalf of our governor. shows me he is engaged, focused, and devoted.

@bress222 Based, you should take you boss' place

@Nicholas J Fuentes Could you rate the optics of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj3KgT9ejDk

@everyone GET THIS GUY ELECTED TO CONGRESS https://dillinghamforcongress.org/

Good dude

@Thomas rather you use the here command just makes more sense

I thought normies couldnt use everyone

normie uprising

oof

@everyone attending the March For Life tomorrow, 1/19, I wish you the best of luck. We must defend our unborn brothers. A society that cannot protect the defenseless will fall to degeneracy. I pray that any attending may have success and bring others to our side

@Broseph I really really wanted to attend this year, good luck man

Hopefully i will be there next year

What about nigger babies

Can we still abort them

And beaners

Obviously the death of any innocent is a tragedy, and should not be treated as truly a tangible viable solution in a civilized state. What concerns me is that we're presently reaching the point where it has become a moral conundrum as to whether or not we would like these people (who are almost our racial enemies in many ways and facets of society) to kill their children so that they do not replace us. If I'm totally honest with myself and others, I have to admit I am quite literally at a moral crossroad when it comes to this.