Message from NateDahl76 in Nice Respectable People Group #general


2018-10-03 16:18:47 UTC  

@NateDahl76 "European roots, American greatness."

2018-10-03 16:18:57 UTC  

@The Eternal Anglo or just labeling us "formerly Identity Evropa"

2018-10-03 16:19:05 UTC  

...though we'd probably lose that with the rebrand.

2018-10-03 16:19:53 UTC  

To be fair, we do a pretty good job at not being labeled "Former National Youth Front"

2018-10-03 16:21:14 UTC  

Yeah I don’t think Nathan’s stuff dogs us that much at all

2018-10-03 16:21:30 UTC  

no matter our name, rebranding will just be a new name for the (((media))) to smear as evil whitey

2018-10-03 16:21:30 UTC  

I think it would only be a matter of time before the SPLC/ADL crowd recognized familiar faces. What they think doesn't matter. What matters is what the average White person thinks of both us and them.

2018-10-03 16:22:29 UTC  

and no, we don't care what the ADL says about us, but normies do, so a rebrand doesn't fix a thing imo

2018-10-03 16:22:43 UTC  

and just makes us look like optics cucks

2018-10-03 16:23:02 UTC  

Identity CivNat is all it would look like to most. <:really:453005408064241674>

2018-10-03 16:23:32 UTC  

The only way a name change makes any sense is if it’s altering the message it sends. But again i think the risk/reward isnt worth it and it would be better to change the logo

2018-10-03 16:23:33 UTC  

I think your average White person is looks upon with the SPLC and ADL with more and more suspicion by the day. They key is continuing to agitate and drive them crazy, while leaving nothing with which to fault us.

2018-10-03 16:23:41 UTC  

Exactly, our target audience is to gain the trust, and respect of the average White American, not the attention of the Mass media, SPLC, and ADL.

Secondly, which this is very important... people today, now more than ever, have a *huge* distrust of the MSM, and other big orgs associated with the MSM. We're set up perfectly

2018-10-03 16:23:43 UTC  

If we’re going to change anything at all

2018-10-03 16:23:48 UTC  

I think rebranding would give us a certain distance from Charlottesville and give us more legitimacy to appeal to the average Conservative and Centrist. But we shouldn't do it to get the media or the SPLC off our backs, we should do it so we can reach our target demographic.

2018-10-03 16:23:51 UTC  

Plus we’re doing pretty great right now. No need for the debate atm, and I think Patrick has been pretty clear about his stance for the time being

2018-10-03 16:24:07 UTC  

We *ARE* optics cucks. The Optics War proved how vital optics are, lol.

2018-10-03 16:24:34 UTC  

@Sherlock and what is your logo suggestion? what conveys what you see as proper and bold?

2018-10-03 16:24:59 UTC  

optics cucking to the point of looking like boring civnats is a bridge too far though

2018-10-03 16:25:00 UTC  

Too much rebranding ruins the brand and the reputation that we have built with people who aren’t paying super close attention

2018-10-03 16:25:15 UTC  

That being said, wouldn’t mind if we change the v to a u lmao

2018-10-03 16:25:19 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD It would be an aesthetic change, not an idealogical change. It's not like we'd start accepting based Nigerians if we rebranded. So how is it optics cucking?

2018-10-03 16:26:35 UTC  

I just don't want IE to end up being watered down with a bunch of civnat normies that eventually *do* want to bring in That Guy T or Brian Logan or some other "Based blegs"

2018-10-03 16:26:51 UTC  

There would be virtually no aesthetic difference between us, and the other (majority) civnat groups in the United States. What makes us so effective is that *we are* unique in the way we present ourselves, our organisation, and our message.

2018-10-03 16:27:03 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD Same here. We'd be retaining the same leadership and standards, though.

2018-10-03 16:27:05 UTC  

see, changing the v to a u i could get behind

2018-10-03 16:27:14 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD I dont have a logo suggestion

2018-10-03 16:27:24 UTC  

I don't know. I like the V.\

2018-10-03 16:27:30 UTC  

Because I’ve never given it any thought

2018-10-03 16:28:08 UTC  

Even if we are optics cucks, it's important not to distance ourselves too far from Charlottsville because otherwise you might invite people into our organization that won't appreciate it.

2018-10-03 16:28:10 UTC  

I'm going to say it: Red, white, and blue.... is **Boring.**

2018-10-03 16:28:32 UTC  

Regardless of the situation, our name will eventually be slandered again.

2018-10-03 16:28:34 UTC  

i'm in favor of renaming the group *Amerimutts United* with a rainbow powerfist as our symbol

2018-10-03 16:28:35 UTC  

literally every politician uses red/white/blue for their logos.

2018-10-03 16:28:41 UTC  

It literally doesn't matter.

2018-10-03 16:28:53 UTC  

It would just have to be the overall palette. Nothin' says we couldn't spruce it up with a little originality here and there...

2018-10-03 16:29:07 UTC  

Just needs to be recognizably American.

2018-10-03 16:29:10 UTC  

Maybe but red white and blue has the advantage of being meaningful to everyone whereas a teal triangle is also boring and conveys nothing to practically everyone

2018-10-03 16:29:11 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD It would be much easier to attract funding and humam capital if we rebranded. If we think that's optics cucking, we will always be a fringe group.

2018-10-03 16:29:17 UTC  

Changing the IE logo wouldn't get any of the Leftist outlets to stop calling us white supremacists.

2018-10-03 16:29:40 UTC  

they aren't concerned with media, they want more people