UBI has been tried now, didn't work.

inb4 the commies claim Finland isn't real socialism anymore.

I was septictal of UBI

will give that a read later

Thia can work in countries with small population

But with small amounts

I guess

Real UBI has never been tried!

Lol

lol

They should try it again, with double the amount.

why not triple?

Yeah, that's totally what I said

or quadruple?

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

If it works for n, why not for n+1?

Because with n+1 it's not doable

And you don't want to give an amount that will possibilitates to sit on their asses for the rest of their lives

A small amount like 100 euros, just something to go to a movie or something should be doable

There is a trick about welfare... It's doable and it should be done? Yeah, but it can't be with a high amount of money and it needs a certain amount of regulations.


If the Finnish government want to give money to people, they probably can, but it had to be something that's not possible for someone to live with that, it's the same thing with welfare, it has to be something that it's not possible to live solely with that, or else you create a situation where people will join the system just to take advantage of it



@Deleted User @DanielKO

or just don't do it

Maybe, but it's fair to help people who contributed into the system when they need

@Deleted User He wrote n+1, I’m fucking triggered.!!!!

@meratrix reee harder

discrete math is life

git gud faggot

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE <:pepe_smile:378719407977005068> <:pepe_sweat:378719424548569088>

~(AB) = ???

@meratrix

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

it's ~A+~B you dummy

dadoi

no shit sherlock

ehehehe

Admittedly

I don't like UBI

but the n / n+1 argument is actually valid in this case since the basic cost of living is a more-less fixed sum

so eg. if the cost of one-room rent, food, clothing and transport comes out to 300 bucks a month

there's a huge difference between UBI of say 100 bucks and of 400

The big problem is, how do you create an incentive for people to get back into the workforce?

That's what the studies on it are attempting to figure out - if it actually keeps people away from the workforce. As far as I am aware, it doesn't keep them away. At least not in the countries it's been tested in.