Message from @Thrill1991
Discord ID: 433443037197369374
reeeeeeeee
i wouldn't say don't trust, just take everything with a truckload of salt
one could say a *lot* of salt
yeah
I'm just really skeptical when they show a room full of children being rescued, or receiving emergency treatment. Where are the adults? Did they attack a school, or kindergarten?
And then they somehow have a camera ready to roll and shove on the children's faces.
Reminds of what used to happen a few years ago, not sure if it still happens... in channels like The Dodo, that shows animals being rescued, suddenly there was this ton of dogs being rescued in India, from all sorts of weird situations.
Like one was a pool of tar, or asphalt, or something similar, in the middle of nowhere; it had some 3 puppies with their faces stuck in it.
And, somehow, the "hero" had his friends be there with cameras rolling, find the puppies and "rescue them".
Twice a week they'd have some random "rescue" from an shithole in India like this, absolutely suspicious. As if they were putting the puppies into these situations just to make a "viral rescue video."
Look, to anyone that's following this whole thing
this attack is suspicious
He literally has no reason to do this
He knows the eyes of the world community are on him
So, why would he do this?
oh yeah media narative is BS on this whos the source,, the rebels. who stands to gain if the US gets involved. Hmmmmmm
probably
they're sexists after all #demoreDinduNuffinWrong
**BabaBooey#5719** was cleansed from the server.
You know this is someone I've been following for actually the last couple of months and it's a little bit more Indie in terms of number of followers but I try to go out of my way to support women like this because as men we are very easily labeled as misogynist if we defy feminism.
Her work is pretty good, it's certainly not professional quality (in the editing domain) but at the same time she is a philosophy major who graduated or is graduating with a four-year degree on the topic. So at least she has a little bit of academic background within the philosophy category, specifically talking about feminism
I will not be Wasserman Schultzed. lol
the pee on towels girl isnt good footage, its just a guy accusing her
@Durtle02 theyve been accused of it but the courts threw it out. not sure if any other cases
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/06/google-women-pay-discrimination-lawsuit
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/technology/google-gender-pay-lawsuit.html
If they want equal pay for "equal work", we have to monitor and pay all employees based on their output.
And that comes out of the payroll budget.
I would love to work under such a rule.
IME there's no such thing as equal work, employees with similar credentials can have widely varying outputs
How many Annes does Syria possibly have that we would have to save?
Do they not take wage negotiations into account? If someone is willing to work for less, why on earth would a business say "no no, we're gonna pay you way more than you are asking for"?
negotiation is everything in highpaying jobs
so basically no
i guess their theory is whatever someone else can negotiate, should be the starting offer(??)
But theyre also negating credentials and loyalty
2 people can be hired for the same job, with one candidate having more relevant experience, or have spent longer with the company
if the company had to fill a role in a pinch, this is very likely
It makes me wonder if large corporations are fine with these policies because they can arguably still function, but smaller business are gonna have a tough time if they cant do what is best for them.
Having progressive equalization policies could get you good PR, leading to a net gain on the back of a loss
Even in a company where statistically women are paid less across the board, i bet you could have a woman in your department making much more than you, because she works instead of planning lawsuits all day