probably

they're sexists after all #demoreDinduNuffinWrong

**BabaBooey#5719** was cleansed from the server.

https://youtu.be/OveYXM-WXrI

You know this is someone I've been following for actually the last couple of months and it's a little bit more Indie in terms of number of followers but I try to go out of my way to support women like this because as men we are very easily labeled as misogynist if we defy feminism.

Her work is pretty good, it's certainly not professional quality (in the editing domain) but at the same time she is a philosophy major who graduated or is graduating with a four-year degree on the topic. So at least she has a little bit of academic background within the philosophy category, specifically talking about feminism

https://youtu.be/6EJBtK3VZBs?t=27

I will not be Wasserman Schultzed. lol

the pee on towels girl isnt good footage, its just a guy accusing her

@Durtle02 theyve been accused of it but the courts threw it out. not sure if any other cases
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/06/google-women-pay-discrimination-lawsuit
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/technology/google-gender-pay-lawsuit.html

If they want equal pay for "equal work", we have to monitor and pay all employees based on their output.
And that comes out of the payroll budget.
I would love to work under such a rule.

IME there's no such thing as equal work, employees with similar credentials can have widely varying outputs

How many Annes does Syria possibly have that we would have to save?

define ``"substantially equal"``, lady.
is that ~=
or ==
or =/=
??

Do they not take wage negotiations into account? If someone is willing to work for less, why on earth would a business say "no no, we're gonna pay you way more than you are asking for"?

negotiation is everything in highpaying jobs

so basically no

i guess their theory is whatever someone else can negotiate, should be the starting offer(??)

But theyre also negating credentials and loyalty

2 people can be hired for the same job, with one candidate having more relevant experience, or have spent longer with the company

if the company had to fill a role in a pinch, this is very likely

It makes me wonder if large corporations are fine with these policies because they can arguably still function, but smaller business are gonna have a tough time if they cant do what is best for them.

Having progressive equalization policies could get you good PR, leading to a net gain on the back of a loss

Even in a company where statistically women are paid less across the board, i bet you could have a woman in your department making much more than you, because she works instead of planning lawsuits all day

Sidenote, I feel like I was decieved about the whole Damore thing by people who knew the situation and still treated it like some guy maliciously spamming his tract. They *told* him to write the memo as feeedback

yeah that whole thing was bs

There was one company ran by a woman, came out and said she'd be happy to hire Damore, and thought work was more important than politics. I forget which company, which is a shame because I'd put my money with them, given the chance
(if anyone remembers this tweet please post here)

I've worked with some definitely strong female leaders above me, but at the same time it's not the average woman who is going to strive in that job, nor the average man

I just hope this equality thing doesn't get out of hand. Imagine if just picking a better qualified worker is seen as discrimination against less qualified workers, which it obviously is, but watch them make that a bad thing. Like you have to hire shit people as if they are a protected class.

Well theres a funny thing about that law

Also most high achieving women eventually tap out to start a family.

Its not illegal not to hire them. It's illegal to not hire them *for specific reasons*

for instance if i dont wanna hire you because youre a white cis hetero meanie, I can simply not hire you for no particular reason

if I made a note on your CV that says "white af -- DNH!!", that would be illegal

I honestly wouldn't even have a problem with that. For example if applied for a job at a black barbershop and they said no, we only hire black people, I wouldn't even be upset.

I would cry cause im a wigger 😄

it's their business they can run it however they want

it makes sense, you wouldnt be hired in a woman's salon. the job is not only nails, its cameraderie

all this discrimination talk completely ignores a business owners right to pick and choose what is best for them

as if they arent even people

what about the right to work with people you actually LIKE?