@Jacob i'll dm something to you

@Jacob I don't really have a dog in the fight, but to counter your retard son king, kings have been getting couped and assassinated since kings existed.

and again,
>implying monarchy is rule of one man

>inb4 (((goldstein)))

@Tyler0317 Basically it's a constitutional monarchy with a lot of restrictions on the monarch that allows for both authority and democracy to be achieved.

@Deleted User True, but that takes away the main benefit monarchy can offer, which is the stability o a long time ruler

@YourFundamentalTheorum I there's a rule about archiving all links

@Sacramento woof forgot that one

@Jawa roger

http://archive.is/zMdLn

bam

Monarchy today would be largely the rule of the king's advisers and an even less accountable bureaucracy than we have today

Even a good king can't supervise everything

well it's still better than an international clique supervising everything

(((Kings advisers)))

the biggest problem today is probably lack of accountability

Historically, monarchs have often fallen in debt to (((international financiers))) of their wars, but democracy hardly proved any more immune to subversion so I won't press that point too hard

monarchs are also a much better rallying point than a democracy

people would rather die for a monarch

than a president

who will be gone in 4 years

*8...

i'm talking about kamala harris here

@YourFundamentalTheorum I think people would rather die for "the republic" than "the monarch"

@YourFundamentalTheorum I disagree completely. People would rather die for their nation and their people, not for some random royal family. Perhaps that's different where the monarchy has been in place for centuries, but not here

@Sacramento idk I would not die for any republic

but that's me

@Deleted User I'm not implying that. Retardo president would be pretty bad, even though presidents aren't dictators.

And couping and assassinating isn't something good to depend on.

@YourFundamentalTheorum Then what would you die for?

@Sacramento God and Tsar

I would die for my people, not a system of government per se. That said, if the race issue was settled and we somehow had a monarchy, I'd try to tear it down because that is not what I want for my people

I'd die for Trump Kahn tbh

@Jacob when in the case of monarchy though, my point is it's exponentially easier to accomplish than any other governance

Gentlemen, it's 1:20 AM here in TN.

Thank you all for the stimulating conversation.

🛏

@TMatthews Your people and your governing body are supposed to be synonymous. Maybe not these days, but that's how I meant it

Everyone knows who Donald Trump is, most conservatives could barely explain the concept of "The Republic"

Go with what you know

@Sacramento Government by and for the people is something to die for, on the understanding that "the people" means just us whites, and that it cannot be completely democratic

I like elections. I dislike universal suffrage

whoever mentioned lack of responsibility, it was caused by the republic. The republic disseminates responsibility from representative to representative. Meanwhile an absolute monarch is responsible for everything, absolutely everything to God.

@YourFundamentalTheorum That was a really good quote, but the problems I mentioned still stand.

Also, there are others ways of resolving the problem of dumb masses than monarchy.