I thought we were against diversity

Mr. Warwick sportin' the Eagle Scout shirt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AY8d_bDu_Jo

So he does own shirts

@Logan I'd say if a civnat supported all that stuff, *then* we could say that they're almost there. Definitely a good first step, but we still need a radical vanguard.

I get there's a time and place to bring out each talking point but really, the left never walks back so preemptively from what they really want

The left is in control they don’t have to

@Ald Helps when you already have a century or more of inertia behind you.

Civnats are good allies to have for now, I don't know a single one that doesn't want to send them back and build the wall at the bare minimum

They walked back al through the 60s and 70s they subverted and lied their way into running this country

They long marched into the institutions preaching love and peace

So why keep playing their game?

Because it works

Of course that doesn't mean abandon our principles and cuck to them but tbh take what we can get for now

They won using that strategy

Incrementalism has its merits.

We can’t go around preaching racialism when we have five other steps to get first imo

IE is part of the broader populist revolt against globalism, which includes civic nationalists.

Depends on what you define as “we”

There need to be people telling the truth about forbidden topics.

Racialism should be preached for those who can be convinced. That doesn't mean other issues aren't talked about simultaneously

Might be useful https://youtu.be/JY5t6iUzajk

Trump calling out the fallen never-Trumpers, just like Jazzhands said he needed to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=demF6H-TNCE

I agree there does. I just don’t know if we should be spearheading it if we want to progress further into relevancy and support

I guess it comes down to what we want to be

If we want to truly become the face of American nationalism it’s a bad idea

This is an issue as old as the movement. Mainstreaming of this kind has never worked

Bringing us to them rather than them to us

@Jacob the radical vanguard will always be there as long as Trump keeps them on YouTube and Twitter.

I don't want to be the radical vanguard aa much as I want to be in power

It's just weak

If we want to be thought leaders and agitators for a more pro white push I’ll concede that’s how it’s done

WN has never worked.

Mainstreaming was never really tried

It was a couple years ago

Trumpism has been better for White people than WN.

Meanwhile in the Capital of Americastan...

@Reinhard Wolff 100%

@Reinhard Wolff
"There need to be people telling the truth about forbidden topics."

That's what I'm saying. If we don't have guys who are more explicit (keeping optics in mind, of course), then by the time civnats are "ready" to go further right, they'll have no where to go. That's why we need guys on multiple parts of the spectrum. One thing that James Allsup did great was he was a bridge between more moderate civnats and us. He had one focus that he did really well.

In mainstreaming it's about who's moving for who. Trumpism has brought the mainstream a little closer to us

That was the victory of it. Not us cucking

@Logan You can help out the radical vanguard (us) on the down low while publicly being a part of your local Republican Party, which it sounds like you're already doing

One of the journos pressed Trump on social media censorship. His campaign manager knows how important this issue was to 2016 going off well but I wonder if Trump will actually take action in time.