Message from @Friedrich
Discord ID: 798266532849254400
doesn't make sense why dominion would have traffic flowing through all these countries either
too many things to go wrong if you were trying to switch votes lol
Not to mention they did hand recount GA and the ballots match the machine
He’s not a liberal.
Did they do an audit?
I guess Italy was chosen because they had everyone else from the Democrats to bill gates to soros etc they forgot to include the pope in all this.
I think they did two audits, the trump lawyers just didn't trust that the paper ballots were valid/real or that signature matching was done up to par
@rip.lul that is better than a audit. An audit is only a small sample. They did a full hand recount twice
and you can't redo signature verification after envelopes are shredded
Ah, so no audit?
Um better than a audit
I have worked on 2 satellite related projects in my career - building software systems in support of them - so I have a fairly comprehensive understanding of what is involved. The amount of complexity and the giant footprints that would be left from using satellites to hack into networks makes it practically absurd. Even if the Vatican satellites had coverage in Germany, there would have to be equipment on the ground to connect them to the network where the servers were. Otherwise, they would connect to the Internet to connect to the servers, which in that case, why would they need satellites??? It makes no sense.
in-person voting, with voter id, and without any adjudication would prevent most of the allegations
Trying to figure out how that answers my question. <:einstein:618543618529034262>
Well first off it doesn’t seem like you know what a audit is. @rip.lul
How so?
I'd love to see a revote just to see if the outcome changes 🍿
Secondly they took the machines out of the equation and didn’t two full hand recounts. Looked at every ballot again twice and counted them with observers present @rip.lul
if Maw bans someone, I am gonna name the event Mawgate
Um... but wifi
lol
And someone tested positive
Because an audit is only dealing with a small sample of ballots @rip.lul
Adjudication is done by Vote Review Panels in every jurisdiction. People who consider this a point of fraud don't understand the process.
Still trying to figure out how it ‘seems’ like I don’t know what an audit is. But k
yeah I just mean it doesn't come into play with in-person 'console' voting
That’s presumptuous.
Not really. Either you are asking for signature matching post removing the envelope which is impossible. Or you are talking about the machines which is equally ridiculous @rip.lul
All you know is that he is acting very much like he doesn't know.
That’s true
When you audit ‘small sample size of X’ if their are irregularities it leads to a further audit.
In any set of data.
Risk Limiting Audits are done on a subset of the total vote. This subset is determined by the amount of ballots cast and the margin of victory. In GA, with 5m ballots cast and a margin of victory of less than 15k, the Risk Limiting Audit would have entailed 1.5m randomly selected ballots. It was determined that the overhead to do it that way was more than just doing a complete recount. That is how they ended up doing a complete recount under the auspices of a RLA. @rip.lul
I just asked if they did an audit and you said I don’t know what an audit it. @james j simple question, not a simple answer.