But I'm for experimenting on animals I think...

Transhumanism big gay rt

Really haven't thought deeply about it...

If we experiment on His creatures who really are the animals?

@missliterallywho I want space travel so I can find a planet that doesn’t have steam power 😎

Pagang stands eternally opposed to the Jüden science that is gene editing

@Kingfish I support your dreams king

Thanks kween

You could convince me with a strong religious bible based argument. I am all for objective morality.

@missliterallywho when the grid goes down I'll send a passenger pigeon wishing you luck

But I'm not sure you could make the argument.

@Gibson Gibson you aren't pagan

You're a gamer

@Gibson Good point-- jews have more genetic diseases than any other group. This tech is their dream.

Imagine not using plastic cup and string phones for post-apocalyptic communication

@Kingfish my loyalties are with both camps my lord

can anyone explain why australia is so cucked?

@missliterallywho exactly brao

A gamer has no higher loyalty

Sounds like @missliterallywho's takin' the Curt Doolittle pill 😎 https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/24/revolution-never-has-an-empire-been-more-fragile/

I play Minecraft to get in touch with my ancestors while gaming

I mean is selective breeding like we have done with domestic animals to manipulate genes immoral?

The debate was dying down

F

From a biblical perspective I don't see how you could make the argument.

Friendship kills debates
F

Well I'm not beholden to a biblical perspective personally

If I was I'd be with you on that

@Bjorn - MD haven't read him in a long time but I'll definitely check out that link, thanks!

Whats to stop a team of people from going to some unregulated country in the middle of nowhere and making designer babies?

That's fine, but if it is a moral question what is your moral basis?

Why would designer babies be bad?

@Sam Anderson huh interesting

That is what selective breeding is

because apparently we wont know when to stop @MrBland - VA

I guess we'd have to regulate it really good

Honestly I don't have a single doctrine I derive my morals from, I'd guess it's mostly coming from a civic morality to ensure the health and security of my people

Selective breeding has inherent limits that gene editing does not

The diverse now demand access to the pale. Even if the pale find some way to carve out their own places, but remain within the law, the diverse will find some way to force their way inside. In other words, the Danegeld of the Civil Rights Movement, which was affirmative action, was not enough. It turns out Kipling was right about the Danegeld. Once you have paid the diverse, you never get rid of the diverse. FROM https://thezman.com/wordpress/

Selective breeding is a fantastic start

So the "good of the people" idea @Kingfish