Message from @missliterallywho
Discord ID: 517411991149871111
You could convince me with a strong religious bible based argument. I am all for objective morality.
@missliterallywho when the grid goes down I'll send a passenger pigeon wishing you luck
But I'm not sure you could make the argument.
You're a gamer
@Gibson Good point-- jews have more genetic diseases than any other group. This tech is their dream.
Imagine not using plastic cup and string phones for post-apocalyptic communication
can anyone explain why australia is so cucked?
@missliterallywho exactly brao
A gamer has no higher loyalty
Sounds like @missliterallywho's takin' the Curt Doolittle pill 😎 https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/24/revolution-never-has-an-empire-been-more-fragile/
I play Minecraft to get in touch with my ancestors while gaming
I mean is selective breeding like we have done with domestic animals to manipulate genes immoral?
The debate was dying down
F
From a biblical perspective I don't see how you could make the argument.
Friendship kills debates
F
Well I'm not beholden to a biblical perspective personally
If I was I'd be with you on that
Whats to stop a team of people from going to some unregulated country in the middle of nowhere and making designer babies?
That's fine, but if it is a moral question what is your moral basis?
Why would designer babies be bad?
@Sam Anderson huh interesting
That is what selective breeding is
because apparently we wont know when to stop @MrBland - VA
I guess we'd have to regulate it really good
Honestly I don't have a single doctrine I derive my morals from, I'd guess it's mostly coming from a civic morality to ensure the health and security of my people
Selective breeding has inherent limits that gene editing does not
The diverse now demand access to the pale. Even if the pale find some way to carve out their own places, but remain within the law, the diverse will find some way to force their way inside. In other words, the Danegeld of the Civil Rights Movement, which was affirmative action, was not enough. It turns out Kipling was right about the Danegeld. Once you have paid the diverse, you never get rid of the diverse. FROM https://thezman.com/wordpress/
Selective breeding is a fantastic start
So the "good of the people" idea @Kingfish
@missliterallywho No prob, lol. Remember, NazLud (National Ludditism) is the final red pill <:usinnoodle:420778112226164736>: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC6Z_kdQoHw
In my opinion yes for the most part
selective breeding can't compete with gene editing
The world is so good at sticking to treaties and agreements, I'm sure everyone would abide by regulations on gene editing <:really:453005408064241674>
I think spirituality or religion is a powerful way to ensure these values in an intangible, socially cohesive concept, but they come from the society itself
My biggest complaint with "civic morality" is it's subjective nature.
Yes its subjective
That's why most societies have different ones