Message from @DariusGalaxyz
Discord ID: 781564499416580126
Can’t stand this fella
Daddy Trump, lol
lol
I noticed that Scytl was not mentioned in last night's lawsuit.
Yeah... Biden would be a disaster for this country
of course, the above proposals by Biden would be challenged in the courts..
It's odd though... firearms are already required to be registered. All of our are. What these anti-gun lunatics don't understand is that criminal who get theirs illegally will STILL do so and they will not be registered no matter how many laws he tries to put in place
Democrats don't seem to get that criminals don't give a flying fig what laws you make.
Exactly
But Smartmatic was mentioned like 50 times, and Eric Coomer was mentioned like a dozen times.
They’ll just make ghost guns
They thin just making more laws will solve the problem. That flaw in logical reasoning is dangerous to this country
if we TRUL:Y want to be safe we should do what Switzerland does... REQUIRE gun ownership, require classes and training on how to properly handle firearms, and require that legal guns be registered, and re-registered if passed on to heirs
Then expand open carry and concealed carry laws... so that the law abiding populace can defend those who need to be defended
Many law abiding gun owners have actually prevented mass shootings and other atrocities because they were armed.
However, I am also buying some crossbows just in case. LOL
@JunoBlade Is it true that these lawsuits only need the preponderance of the evidence burden of proof ?
The burden of proof IS on the plaintiff, which is, of course, the president. His attorneys have plenty of evidence. There are literally more than an thousand sworn affidavits as well as statistical analysis and some whistleblowers
If all of the witnesses were republicans I would say his case would be just a tad bit less strong, but there are democrats who have come forward too.
Plus there is past documentation of fraud and concerns about the voting machines from not only the republicans, but democrats as well as the MSM
The level of proof needed I mean
So all their assertions that everything was absolutely secure are provably disingenuous
yes... they have the level of proof they need
Sworn affidavits are admissible in courts
@JunoBlade Are you saying yes that it only needs to be a preponderance of the evidence ?
When is the next Valorant tournament?
have to vote it up first!
use the <:magahat:772838503239122984>
And how do I run for president?
Happy Thanksgiving!
announce that you're going to?
@everyone If y'all have just joined us for the tournament, go ahead and sign up in the tournament lobby channel
[9:11 AM]
<<#780859909247467560>>
@DariusGalaxyz There needs to be a preponderance of evidence and it needs to be compelling as well.
I do believe that the president's case has both
Cuz I did read (upon delving into it a little further) that in most cases for civil lawsuits that it needs to be a preponderance of the evidence, but that usually for fraud it has to be "clear and convincing evidence".
The latter of which is the middle of the 3 burdens of proof.
@stoneytoney what is the name of the channel we’re we vote?
Nvm
<#781523451235401748>
I just saw it.