Message from @JunoBlade
Discord ID: 781552623156461578
Lol
It would cause people to be upset but it's not sketchy...
My sloppy spelling there.
Lmao
The argument is a solid one and not easy to refute... I used to work for a civil litigation attorney and was going to be a lawyer before I changed career paths
How do you work now?
Foxy, jokes like that are not appropriate for this sever. please keep 'em clean. Thanks!
Yeah
I am a graphic designer
Well that's partly what I mean, it's more of a chance that good valid votes were thrown out. I'd rather do it for the reason that makes them legally unlawfull, lol.
Nice. I was thinking about being a judge but I don’t know how good my safety would be.
I would imagine that both arguments, plus some, will likely be used. The president has a very strong case in this
If I were the attorney handling this case I would use every argument I could... but I think the two above are a couple of the strongest ones
If they can also prove the stuff about Dominion then not only will we get our president back but it will likely trigger a complete overhaul of our system
We need that
Daddy Trump will take the W!
Can’t stand this fella
Daddy Trump, lol
I noticed that Scytl was not mentioned in last night's lawsuit.
Yeah... Biden would be a disaster for this country
of course, the above proposals by Biden would be challenged in the courts..
It's odd though... firearms are already required to be registered. All of our are. What these anti-gun lunatics don't understand is that criminal who get theirs illegally will STILL do so and they will not be registered no matter how many laws he tries to put in place
Democrats don't seem to get that criminals don't give a flying fig what laws you make.
Exactly
But Smartmatic was mentioned like 50 times, and Eric Coomer was mentioned like a dozen times.
They’ll just make ghost guns
They thin just making more laws will solve the problem. That flaw in logical reasoning is dangerous to this country
if we TRUL:Y want to be safe we should do what Switzerland does... REQUIRE gun ownership, require classes and training on how to properly handle firearms, and require that legal guns be registered, and re-registered if passed on to heirs
Then expand open carry and concealed carry laws... so that the law abiding populace can defend those who need to be defended
Many law abiding gun owners have actually prevented mass shootings and other atrocities because they were armed.
However, I am also buying some crossbows just in case. LOL
@JunoBlade Is it true that these lawsuits only need the preponderance of the evidence burden of proof ?
The burden of proof IS on the plaintiff, which is, of course, the president. His attorneys have plenty of evidence. There are literally more than an thousand sworn affidavits as well as statistical analysis and some whistleblowers
If all of the witnesses were republicans I would say his case would be just a tad bit less strong, but there are democrats who have come forward too.
Plus there is past documentation of fraud and concerns about the voting machines from not only the republicans, but democrats as well as the MSM
But mmy question though, lol ?
The level of proof needed I mean
So all their assertions that everything was absolutely secure are provably disingenuous