However, I am also buying some crossbows just in case. LOL

@JunoBlade Is it true that these lawsuits only need the preponderance of the evidence burden of proof ?

The burden of proof IS on the plaintiff, which is, of course, the president. His attorneys have plenty of evidence. There are literally more than an thousand sworn affidavits as well as statistical analysis and some whistleblowers

If all of the witnesses were republicans I would say his case would be just a tad bit less strong, but there are democrats who have come forward too.

Plus there is past documentation of fraud and concerns about the voting machines from not only the republicans, but democrats as well as the MSM

But mmy question though, lol ?

The level of proof needed I mean

So all their assertions that everything was absolutely secure are provably disingenuous

yes... they have the level of proof they need

Sworn affidavits are admissible in courts

@JunoBlade Are you saying yes that it only needs to be a preponderance of the evidence ?

When is the next Valorant tournament?

have to vote it up first!

use the <:magahat:772838503239122984>

And how do I run for president?

Happy Thanksgiving!

announce that you're going to?

@everyone If y'all have just joined us for the tournament, go ahead and sign up in the tournament lobby channel
[9:11 AM]
<<#780859909247467560>>

@DariusGalaxyz There needs to be a preponderance of evidence and it needs to be compelling as well.

I do believe that the president's case has both

Cuz I did read (upon delving into it a little further) that in most cases for civil lawsuits that it needs to be a preponderance of the evidence, but that usually for fraud it has to be "clear and convincing evidence".

The latter of which is the middle of the 3 burdens of proof.

@stoneytoney what is the name of the channel we’re we vote?

Nvm

<#781523451235401748>

I just saw it.

use the <:magahat:772838503239122984>

But thanks

Yes... for these cases though, the burden of proof might be a bit higher than in a private civil litigation because what we are talking about doing is serious

So my guess is that several legal standards will be required... we are, after all, talking about overturning an election that many believe has been finalized.

And really it's all up to the judges, I don't think there's a law that says it has to be proven by those certain amounts ?

It's just typical practice.

And the democrats will go absolutely BONKERS when they overturn it. So we will need to have overwhelming evidence

Where do I check in for the tournament?

<#780859909247467560>

when does it start

I believe, again, that the president's legal team DOES have the evidence and the level of proof they need

Tournament starts in just under 45 minutes.

the stream starts in an hour

it says 1 hour and 44 mins

@wizard man Check in with President-elect toony dude