Message from @Virgil
Discord ID: 520022465984856083
yeah #importisis
That's a great point. I've thought about that, too. @MrDefault
Haha import them right outside of Alex Jones’ compound and get some popcorn
You can accomplish the same level of understanding by looking at china's towns in the US as you can about Detriot.
@Jacob For our purposes if America has to accept immigrants, it would be best if we accept the worst, most dysfunctional and least likely to integrate immigrants imaginable. Which is why I opposed the Raise Act and why Asian immigration is much bigger threat to us than Central American Mestizo or Sub-saharan immigration.
There's a problem with immigrants being too good or too bad. If they're too good, it ends up being a gradual decline that remains unnoticed, but, if they're too bad, then people might say "we let's just take Christians instead". So really it could end badly both ways. Maybe the solution is to just not focus too much on things like religion and just oppose immigration more across the board. @MrDefault
@Virgil Well said. Both sides have good points. I'm honestly kinda divided on this.
@Jacob Yeah "immigration is bad" is better then trying to play 4d chess with it.
@Virgil Do you think it could be a problem, however, that people will see the shitty immigrants and think "well, this just means we need to accept even more of the good ones!"
Immigration is a weapon against us. We dont get to use it to achieve or goals the elites do. Best thing we can do is to limit its use against us. or stop it entirely ideally.
At least with only good immigrants gives us more time til SA status. Assuming we have the agency to act and change our future.
@MrDefault Perhaps, but not necessarily, while America does have a problem with high IQ Asian immigration , it isn't nearly as bad as Canada for example. Because the overall quality of the rest of our immigrants is so poor that it lowers our standards of living to the point where America looks less inviting.
Umm what?
Chinese are buying up the West coast big guy.
Become the third world to defeat the third world shouldnt be our motto or understanding of the situation.
@Jacob Perhaps, but if a nation doesn't have a strong cohesive identity than the people can be persuaded to accept just about anyone and anything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8YJqYpNQT8 Meds in trouble <:nervous:359009898115104770>
This whole channel is pretty cool
All about different people groups and their genetics
@MrDefault Only certain parts like Seattle and Silicone Valley, Canada has a severe issue where wealthy asians are essentially pricing White residents out of their communities, like in Vancouver. To a degree that's happening here but it isn't nearly on the scale as Canada.
And yeah ideally we shouldn't have any non-white immigration at all, but that isn't really the reality we're dealing with here in America. In Poland, it's a different story and I would agree with you there.
🤣🤣🤣Check out @RightHook99’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/RightHook99/status/1070084955810742272?s=09
@Virgil Immigration will never be evenly distributed. Places where high value immigrants will be kept nice and they will move there. Not nice places will be flooded with third worlder's. The problems are more noticeable in Canada because of their smaller population compared to the US.
@fgtveassassin clickbait title, saw it earlier
" ideally we shouldn't have any non-white immigration at all"
*ideally we shouldn't have any immigration at all
Yeah he has a few click baity stuff but overall he has some good info
one people, one nation, end immigration.
Hey, Jacob. You're a fan of immigration, right?
I know that seems like an insane ideologue position, but hear me out. Everything immigration does can be done through guest workers or temporary asylum. I mean, those programs should be kept at a minimum, too, but, I'm just saying, there's really no compelling reason to let people in permanently.
we should just let them all in
I would abolish permanent residency and have people re-apply to temporary residency every few years. During the application process they would have to prove their usefulness.
anti-immigration as some insane ideologue position would contradict the official stance of the organization lol
Yeah I'm mostly teasing. We all know you are against all immigration. It's just about all that you've been talking about it for weeks.
strangely enough, immigration comes up a lot in an organization like ours lol
I wonder if I/E should get Patrick a Bear skin rug for when he does his fireside chats
Very fair counterpoint, Sam. LMAO
Well, think of it this way. I try not to talk about it much with my irl friends, so this is where I go to vent.
I'm very well aware that being the guy who can only talk about one subject isn't good.
And I know you're teasing that was just a joke emoji
Yeah, I know you're an intelligent and dynamic guy. It'd suck if new members got the impression you were one-dimensional, because you aren't