Message from @Kingfish
Discord ID: 522184244194443264
thats way different than the argument you were making earlier
@Sam Southern - TN by renouncing legal claim it doesn't matter how close by blood he is he has no legal claim
He has more of right to the throne because of his noble birth
lol I'm not arguing legal claim, he has a *better* claim than you or any of us do
Not more of a claim than Henri @MrDefault
Guys Kings are made because their Lords fight for them. Pedigrees are legal nonsense.
This is great stuff. I recommend giving this a listen/watch.
Watch "A New French Revolution? (Gilets Jaunes)" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/pr8J1RjknLI
you said he was legitimate "He is legitimate. He cant inherit Spain."
which neither of these are accurate
actually he can't inherit spain anymore so that part is
but if anything he has a way better claim to spain
Unless these fops get 10,000 soldiers to March on the capital theyre not monarchs in any sense.
@Kingfish I said theoretically he could claim both Spain, France and England.
where
scroll up
nvm see it but he can't claim france at all
he could try to claim spain
I'd back that
He could though
Loyalists support him
If they seized power they couldnt annul the treaty of Utrecth
wait who's claiming England?
sure he could overthrow the government and instate himself find
seizing power does not equal inherit.
you know that
Under the grounds that France needs a rightful monarch
Anyone who siezes power can do whatever they want by definition
he cannot legally INHERIT the french throne
That's what power means
he can take it I guess
but thats not a legal inheritance
Legality is for peasents
The way things stand no one can INHERIT the throne
sure
There is no throne
I agree with that
it was abolished in the revolution.
My only point was he no longer has a legal claim
which is correct
that's all I'm saying