Message from @Jacob

Discord ID: 525356091459239946


2018-12-20 16:53:44 UTC  

welp there goes peace in korea

2018-12-20 16:53:57 UTC  

not all of them are atheists

2018-12-20 16:53:59 UTC  

I don't know if there is a term that encompasses both of those interests. Globalists? Cosmopolitans? Internationalists isn't a bad one.

2018-12-20 16:54:10 UTC  

MSM is full of disinformation.

2018-12-20 16:54:15 UTC  

Internationalists would encompass both.

2018-12-20 16:54:26 UTC  

Enemy of the people.

2018-12-20 16:54:34 UTC  

Yes, that might be the most accurate

2018-12-20 16:54:41 UTC  

Internationalism = globalism + cosmopolitanism.

2018-12-20 16:54:58 UTC  

That's also CNN.

2018-12-20 16:55:02 UTC  

Well, I think all those are kinda interchangeable

2018-12-20 16:55:17 UTC  

I think Internationalist is a good term though.

2018-12-20 16:55:34 UTC  

We'll call ourselves Nationalists and our enemies Internationalists. Right vs Left.

2018-12-20 16:55:55 UTC  

It follows the same easy formula.

2018-12-20 16:56:00 UTC  

It works within the system.

2018-12-20 16:56:29 UTC  

I'm not sure if all of our enemies are genuinely internationalists, though it might be good enough for our purposes. Many of them are pretty big fans of nationalism for their own ethnic group.

2018-12-20 16:56:46 UTC  

Indeed. However, we don't need a perfectly accurate term.

2018-12-20 16:56:47 UTC  

;)

2018-12-20 16:57:05 UTC  

Yes, that's why I think it might work for our purposes

2018-12-20 16:57:05 UTC  

What we want is a connotation.

2018-12-20 16:57:17 UTC  

I think that it *will* work for our purposes.

2018-12-20 16:57:32 UTC  

Also I'm not sure how productive it is to discuss those ethnic interests at this point in time

2018-12-20 16:57:40 UTC  

publicly at least

2018-12-20 16:57:41 UTC  

If Internationalism is evil and Nationalism is good, then that's all that people need to understand.

2018-12-20 16:58:11 UTC  

@Jacob It's not productive at all to discuss those ethnic interests publically.

2018-12-20 16:58:30 UTC  

That's stuff for backroom deals made only when necessary. However, we should talk about it privately.

2018-12-20 16:58:42 UTC  

I would have to slightly disagree on that

2018-12-20 16:58:53 UTC  

go on

2018-12-20 16:58:53 UTC  

explicit discussion is not prodictive

2018-12-20 16:58:58 UTC  

Ah.

2018-12-20 16:59:02 UTC  

Ok I agree.

2018-12-20 16:59:46 UTC  

So are we in agreement? I would say that Identitarian Nationalist vs Racist Internationalist is a good spin.

2018-12-20 16:59:53 UTC  

What do you think?

2018-12-20 17:00:22 UTC  

In rhetoric, we should associate Internationalism with Empire and genocide.

2018-12-20 17:00:55 UTC  

Turn the term "Nazi" into the term "Internationalist".

2018-12-20 17:01:13 UTC  

there can be times when it's useful to discuss AIPAC

some people might even be interested in talking about Boasian anthropology or psychoanalysis if it's relevant to fields they are interested in

you don't have to mention what group is behind it though ;)

2018-12-20 17:01:28 UTC  

yes I think we agree

2018-12-20 17:01:35 UTC  

Good.

2018-12-20 17:01:40 UTC  

I agree as well.

2018-12-20 17:02:32 UTC  

If it weren't for a large number of people like the Bush family aiding and abetting it wouldn't happen.

2018-12-20 17:02:50 UTC  

@Jacob Here's something to get fellow whites on board: don't talk about the JQ but do name the Internationalist (((banker))).

2018-12-20 17:03:08 UTC  

I think it's important to acknowledge that this is a constellation a Bad actors which may be centered around a certain International Clique but is hardly limited to that group