Message from @Jacob
Discord ID: 525355461688557589
@Jacob Fair.
@Jacob However, do you have a better term?
They are unironically Marxists though
^
@Perihelion - CA Stinky, smelly, neo-Marxists.
Well, I think the reason we're in this situation is a combination of business interests and hatred towards white people
I agree.
However, our enemy does need a name.
Stuff isn’t going well for Trump recently https://cnn.it/2Cqkcp9
How about Internationalists?
How about athiest Puritans
welp there goes peace in korea
not all of them are atheists
I don't know if there is a term that encompasses both of those interests. Globalists? Cosmopolitans? Internationalists isn't a bad one.
MSM is full of disinformation.
Internationalists would encompass both.
Enemy of the people.
Yes, that might be the most accurate
Internationalism = globalism + cosmopolitanism.
That's also CNN.
I think Internationalist is a good term though.
We'll call ourselves Nationalists and our enemies Internationalists. Right vs Left.
It follows the same easy formula.
It works within the system.
I'm not sure if all of our enemies are genuinely internationalists, though it might be good enough for our purposes. Many of them are pretty big fans of nationalism for their own ethnic group.
Indeed. However, we don't need a perfectly accurate term.
;)
Yes, that's why I think it might work for our purposes
What we want is a connotation.
I think that it *will* work for our purposes.
Also I'm not sure how productive it is to discuss those ethnic interests at this point in time
publicly at least
If Internationalism is evil and Nationalism is good, then that's all that people need to understand.
@Jacob It's not productive at all to discuss those ethnic interests publically.
That's stuff for backroom deals made only when necessary. However, we should talk about it privately.
I would have to slightly disagree on that
go on
explicit discussion is not prodictive
Ah.
Ok I agree.