Also I'm not sure how productive it is to discuss those ethnic interests at this point in time

publicly at least

If Internationalism is evil and Nationalism is good, then that's all that people need to understand.

@Jacob It's not productive at all to discuss those ethnic interests publically.

That's stuff for backroom deals made only when necessary. However, we should talk about it privately.

I would have to slightly disagree on that

go on

explicit discussion is not prodictive

Ah.

Ok I agree.

So are we in agreement? I would say that Identitarian Nationalist vs Racist Internationalist is a good spin.

What do you think?

In rhetoric, we should associate Internationalism with Empire and genocide.

Turn the term "Nazi" into the term "Internationalist".

there can be times when it's useful to discuss AIPAC

some people might even be interested in talking about Boasian anthropology or psychoanalysis if it's relevant to fields they are interested in

you don't have to mention what group is behind it though ;)

yes I think we agree

Good.

I agree as well.

If it weren't for a large number of people like the Bush family aiding and abetting it wouldn't happen.

@Jacob Here's something to get fellow whites on board: don't talk about the JQ but do name the Internationalist (((banker))).

I think it's important to acknowledge that this is a constellation a Bad actors which may be centered around a certain International Clique but is hardly limited to that group

Many huwhites are also against racial discrimination. It would be wise to point out that we are the subject of that discrimination.

In fact, take a stance against war, Internationalist bankers, and the death of the American labour movement, and we have the previous Democratic party's niche.

combine that with Isolationist rhetoric, conservatism, and protectionism, and you've got a platform to talk to your GOP kingmaker.

Socialism with nationalist qualities?

Sshhh

not out loud ;)

We can have an entirely "economic" approach to this that will undermine our enemies *and* appeal to suburban huwhites.

Here's the best part: we can make the entire debate about tax policy with both sides agreeing on immigration.

It's the same Dem vs Republican trap.

;)

A lot of people on our side don't understand the JQ

It's not supposed to be our version of systemic oppression where we blame a group for our problems. That's dumb and a loser mentality.

The JQ is about how Jews have a distinct ethnic identity. Since identity is the basis of politics, this leads to distinct political interests which don't necessarily align with our own.

It's not "Jews are bad", it's really a neutral statement. It's not a judgement in either direction.

We should probably have members infiltrate the Democratic party as well.

The way that is done is that the largest donors to both parties are the banks

@Jacob I know. However, introducing the JQ that way is going to be a bit easier if we attach it to their victim mentality.

The banks are the slow game and it takes two hundred years

@Perihelion - CA Indeed. We can use the whole "money in politics" schtick to get at them as well.

200 years is a reasonable time frame

if we get birth rates and immigration under control

Anyone who uses it to blame our problems on someone else is dumb.

Those who make excuses always fail

Indeed. However, if we attach the JQ to their "elitist banker" blame game, we can offer them a solution.