okay then

so if a political party in america said we should indoctrinate the youth into hating tibetans and wanting to genocide them, what basis would you have to oppose that action?

You're saying "if society changed its moral stance, then morals would be different"

Yes. You're starting to become a subjectivist

no

I would because I am morally opposed to genocide

but if you were raised in a society where it was okay

you would not be morally opposed to it?

It's impossible to answer that, but sure. If I was taught and raised that that was OK and never exposed to a different Form of moral reasoning, it's likely that I would be ok with genocide

That makes sense to me

and that is equal in your view

to thinking genocide is bad?

What do you mean by equal?

as in, there is no distinction

we have no basis to condemn genocide, outside our own society's norms

Correct. Do you have one? I'd like to hear it. That could be massively powerful

okay then

so if i say I really fucking hate chinese

and i want to exterminate each and every last one of them

but

before i do it

i change the society's norms into accepting such an action,

you would not oppose me?

Before we go off into another hypo with the exact same answer, let's focus on the question we already established it leads us to

GG @WMLC, you just advanced to level 4!

no

answer the question

yes/no

It's impossible to answer that, but sure. If I was taught and raised that that was OK and never exposed to a different Form of moral reasoning, it's likely that I would be ok with genocide

That makes sense to me

no no

thats not the answer

i said

i would change the society

you are already born in this example

It's impossible to answer that, but sure. If I was brainwashed/hyponotized that that was OK and never exposed to a different Form of moral reasoning, it's likely that I would be ok with genocide

no

on this example

you are not brainwashed

the society is

as this brainwashing happens

would you oppose it?