Because it's useful to express general ideas in a quick manner. That's basically it tbh

I thought they wanted to?

idk lmao

Stop pinging me

@Starlixa What do you mean they dont want to be labeled, its just that some people dont want identities attached t them they dont identify with and others are the opposite

To be honest I don't give a shit about any of them

They're just normal people

tru

fr

some of them are damn sensitive

GG @Reyue | 玥, you just advanced to level 1!

There's literally a sexuality, I can't remember the name of it, but the description is "a sexuality which refuses to be categorized"

<:emoji_51:771471255936303105>

“Winston Churchill said the destiny of man is not measured by material complications, when great forces are on the move in the world we learn we’re spirits - not animals. He said there’s something going on in time and space and beyond time and space, which whether we like it or not spells duty. You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.” - Ronald Reagan. Thoughts? Is our future already written? <@&771015472425598985> <@&771015502902067250>

NOOOOO

no wtf

WE DON’T HAVE IMAGE PERMS

hail Reagan

Bruh stop pinging me

whoever wrote our future is either illiterate or nonexistent

Turn off debate pings then retard @Σցց

You chose the debate ping you retard

Idealism is cringe

How so?

egg if you don't wanna be pinged then turn off notifications

he chose the fucking debate ping

in roles

I believe reality is deterministic

However I’m agnostic as to if the future has been planned out

So a God has made our past up to now, and is making the universe. Who knows if its planned.

People, their ideas, the decisions they make are informed by the culture and society around them. If you wish to meaningfully predict and understand the actions of people, why systems behave the way they do, why good men do evil things and evil men do good things, you MUST analyze the material world around them. The economic and social realities they exist within.

Feudalism was no fluke, liberalism was no fluke

They were pushed by economic and social realities that we can see and measure

This is more of a meta-ethical than metaphysical claim

We ought analyse history materially

Principle of sufficent reason be like

Well this is what Reagan was rejecting, historical materialism.

Or SRS Theory or whatever

Wouldn’t he be defending it?

That theres a material end to history?