Message from @Signia
Discord ID: 796166850743369769
There's literally a sexuality, I can't remember the name of it, but the description is "a sexuality which refuses to be categorized"
<:emoji_51:771471255936303105>
“Winston Churchill said the destiny of man is not measured by material complications, when great forces are on the move in the world we learn we’re spirits - not animals. He said there’s something going on in time and space and beyond time and space, which whether we like it or not spells duty. You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.” - Ronald Reagan. Thoughts? Is our future already written? <@&771015472425598985> <@&771015502902067250>
NOOOOO
no wtf
WE DON’T HAVE IMAGE PERMS
hail Reagan
Bruh stop pinging me
whoever wrote our future is either illiterate or nonexistent
Turn off debate pings then retard @Σցց
You chose the debate ping you retard
Idealism is cringe
How so?
egg if you don't wanna be pinged then turn off notifications
he chose the fucking debate ping
in roles
I believe reality is deterministic
However I’m agnostic as to if the future has been planned out
So a God has made our past up to now, and is making the universe. Who knows if its planned.
People, their ideas, the decisions they make are informed by the culture and society around them. If you wish to meaningfully predict and understand the actions of people, why systems behave the way they do, why good men do evil things and evil men do good things, you MUST analyze the material world around them. The economic and social realities they exist within.
Feudalism was no fluke, liberalism was no fluke
They were pushed by economic and social realities that we can see and measure
This is more of a meta-ethical than metaphysical claim
We ought analyse history materially
Principle of sufficent reason be like
Well this is what Reagan was rejecting, historical materialism.
Or SRS Theory or whatever
Wouldn’t he be defending it?
That theres a material end to history?
Which is already decided
Communism in the case of Marxism
Reagan was not a determinist, was he?
Moreover, isn't idealism incompatible with determinism?
He quoted Churchill being a hard determinist
Im not a hard determinist
But I am a determinist
Pretty sure Churchill's statement is anti-materialist
And therefore anti-determinist
Churchills would be hard determinist, but idealist
A typical protestant view