Message from @Doc

Discord ID: 773720764654288897


2020-11-04 19:03:10 UTC  

๐Ÿ˜ƒ ๐Ÿ‘ that's a great start

2020-11-04 19:06:17 UTC  

Agree, hopefully some people follow suit

2020-11-04 19:06:25 UTC  

wow look at that

2020-11-04 20:10:20 UTC  

I'd normally question how you can subject someone to such conditions but the Stanford Experiment (I believe that's what it was) answers the question.

2020-11-04 23:57:39 UTC  

@DeathRhodes666 yeah the prison experiment was brutal.

2020-11-04 23:58:37 UTC  

The Stanford prison experiment is infamous. A movie was made about that.

2020-11-05 00:01:48 UTC  

yeah i saw it. it was pretty good

2020-11-05 00:01:59 UTC  

and i heard is pretty faithful to what really happened

2020-11-05 01:27:42 UTC  

Check out Milgram's torture experiment as well, if that isnt known. @TheParamedicGamer @True

2020-11-05 01:28:29 UTC  

The two compliment each other somewhat.

2020-11-05 01:28:34 UTC  

oh really now. i shall

2020-11-05 01:28:51 UTC  

Uncomfortable insight into human nature.

2020-11-05 01:29:02 UTC  

sounds about right

2020-11-05 01:29:25 UTC  

But hey, if youre a paramedic, I am preaching to the choir. ๐Ÿ˜„

2020-11-05 01:29:45 UTC  

the name is only slightly misleading

2020-11-05 01:29:52 UTC  

im working on it

2020-11-05 01:29:58 UTC  

but i am still an EMT

2020-11-05 01:30:00 UTC  

so yeah

2020-11-05 01:30:02 UTC  

still

2020-11-05 01:30:05 UTC  

good for you. Hit me up if I can help.

2020-11-05 01:30:18 UTC  

Hippocratic oath ยง2, take care of the family

2020-11-05 01:30:36 UTC  

thanks!!

2020-11-06 02:16:25 UTC  

Can we get the 9ths ruling on concealed carry being reasonable suspicion of a crime to SCOTUS? Like I am just curious if anyone wants to defend that ruling ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-11-06 02:19:03 UTC  

@DeathRhodes666 I have heard that the Stanford experiment was not sound science. Basically it was one guy engaging in most the abuse. And he said later he just did it because he thought the experiment was going well and felt sympathetic towards the professor.

2020-11-06 02:19:38 UTC  

Yeah there were so many flaws in what went on and how it was guided. Still a pretty hard lesson on what people do when given almost unlimited power over others

2020-11-06 02:24:50 UTC  

`felt sympathetic towards the professor` rofl

2020-11-06 03:20:23 UTC  

Yeah I've looked into it. Far better example here: https://youtu.be/JM2o9e-pwoE

2020-11-06 03:21:44 UTC  

My father in law (Polish) survived Auschwitz. Brainwashing and psychological transformation is totally possible but not likely to happen within a few weeks without a major cataclysmic event imho โ˜บ

2020-11-06 03:28:23 UTC  

* grandfather-in-law

2020-11-06 03:34:48 UTC  

Yeah, it takes four years to brainwash people on average.


I mean four years ago all my liberal friends believed everyoneโ€™s vote should count equally. Flash forward to two weeks ago and I see people saying they would rather end Trump than COVID.

2020-11-06 04:50:53 UTC  

@Lady Georgia You dont need to brainwash people to bring out the tyrant. Its build into the human psyche and will come out if nurtured. It looks like the "debunker" has misunderstood the experiment and is attempting to falsify an experiment which did not take place. Zimbardo is showing what *can* be done. Not what develops by random. Massive difference.

2020-11-06 04:53:21 UTC  

I think the experiment has largely been used to 'prove' what is likely to happen in the absence of external factors, and that seems to be the conclusion encouraged by the researchers ๐Ÿ™‚

2020-11-06 04:54:05 UTC  

If so, that is a misunderstanding of data provided.

2020-11-06 04:54:20 UTC  

I agree a tyrant is within each of us. I just disagree that the experiment does much to prove that.

2020-11-06 04:54:26 UTC  

Its not what Zimbardo is showing. Like Milgram, he demonstrates what can be done.

2020-11-06 04:55:36 UTC  

We repeated it when I was a resident, and i checked out here as well. Nurses were inclined to administer harmful doses of medication if an authoritarian doctor ordered it.

2020-11-06 04:55:43 UTC  

If key participants stated they were in fact 'acting' the whole time, in such a small sample I would suggest that puts the experiment largely out of the pool of useful research

2020-11-06 04:56:03 UTC  

Unless you can confirm it again and again.

2020-11-06 04:56:15 UTC  

And test it by *coherency*