ok lets say there is a straw purchase what if anything dose that have to do with his case. I look at this as two different cases altogether and try n to tie them two together would be a waist of time. Or possibly defense wants this info for some weird double jeopardy thing down the road if they win the trial case.
So hypothetical question about this case...if there was no video for this case how close would the rest evidence be to showing what happened (with video) Also would this case have completely different out come (no video)
We wouldn't be able to speculate with any accuracy. Keep in mind, however, the lack of evidence favors defendants, but witness testimony also could be extremely biased for obvious reasons.
In this case, however, he opened fire on a left leaning crowd, the ones famous for shouting ACAB and then desperatly calling 911 to scream for help followed by a lawsuit where they sue the police for bigotry.
But to bring it back onto the case; he fired in self defense only. That is a very American right. A coordinated lie would change that in absence of video-evidence.
Well when lawyers do something wrong, they tend to end up being sanctioned, as for that particular example, he probably won't just lose his license if this is the only thing he's had filed against him.
