the deep recesses...

(and this is how you turn to the evil aliens)

indeed

is there a moderator here? can we have an #offtopic channel so I can tell everyone why they are wrong about aliens

😄

so far it seems hr. Esq pulls a well educated posse. No need for moderation.

yes

but someone created the channels

they didn't exist forever, right? #existential-questions

maybe they were always there and we just passed by, so that for us they came into existence?

> @WatchingYouDaily
>
> He's done a fine job with the mostly peaceful protests.
@Michele411 I am assuming you don't live in Washington state.

364 days out of the year I murder nobody. 1 Day a year, I murder 1 person.

I'm mostly peaceful.

what about leap years?

Well every four years is a leap year so 1/4 of a person on top of the yearly 1?

one murder and one removed extremity pr. year

I'm hearing an idea that a devote in which each state only gets one vote is a possibility and wanted your opinion on whether that's a legitimate possibility

is this what you're referring to? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingent_election#:~:text=4%20Proposed%20alterations-,Electoral%20College%20overview,and%20the%20District%20of%20Columbia.

@Doc isn't there a burn chart that labels each body areas by percentage? Probably a good guide haha.

indeed there is

but I can teach you the rule of 9?

so you will never forget?

arm = 9%, head = 9%, leg = (2 X 9) %, torso (4x9) %

or, if you will, the arm is 9%, the leg two arms and the torso two legs.

@DeathRhodes666

Most fortuitous

So about 2 1/2 body parts per year then haha

if measured by surface, then, yes.

I don't even want to get into breaking down what pats constitute what percentage specifically. Too much math for me

What are the other platforms for this show?

You tube is being stupid

Not that I know of

Yeah it’s down everywhere for me

Just came up on you tube

In order for the House to choose the President, the electoral college votes must be tied or neither candidate gaining enough electoral votes (270 to win). I has nothing to do with the concession of either candidate or courts resolving the issues. It has everything to do with the electoral college votes being a tie or lack of enough electoral votes for either candidate.

From Amendment 12 of the US Constitution:
"The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice."

A tie in electoral college votes has happened once, in 1800.
However....there was an election in 1824 in which one candidate DID win the majority of the electoral vote and it still went through this process. This happened because of multiple candidates and a required electoral vote of 131 to win. Jackson had 99 electoral votes while all other candidates had less.
And...there was an election in 1876 in which Hayes received 185 electoral college votes to Tilden's 184 electoral collage votes....which was resolved by the Compromise of 1877.

The show is also on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RobertGrulerEsq

and FB: https://www.facebook.com/YourCriminalDefenseAttorney/videos/374206796968415

thanks, watching on Twitter now

awesome!

https://www.indiarightnownews.com/former-nv-ag-bombshell-ai-and-computer-vision-experts-reveal-signature-verification-setting-for-200k-ballots-was-manually-lowered-to-40-video/