Message from @realz
Discord ID: 777787380747862027
> Just an update on the status of the Shiva theory. https://youtu.be/aokNwKx7gM8
@DrSammyD yeah his analysis (or his recreation of Shiva's analysis) is a little different than I thought. I thought it was top of ticket divided by downline voting on a per party basis and I think that's what you were plotting. MI is somewhat unique because it allows for straight line party voting and I think many states have done away with that. I defer to his analysis since he recreated Shiva's results. Now it does bring up some interesting questions about what went on in GA. That one Rep Sen got nearly an identical vote count as Trump, but the Dem candidate was nearly 100k down from Biden. Part of it was that the Libertarian candidate for Sen had almost twice the total as the Libertarian candidate for Pres. The other part of was that top of the ticket voters outnumbered downline in this case by some ~40k.
Again my interest in the GA Sen is more as to who is likely to win the runoff.
is any of this going to come into play? https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
@meglide Don't get me wrong, I still think Mish has way too few independents voting Trump purely because of the MN, IL, and WI results, which I found due to this type of analysis, so it bore fruit. But yeah, the pure "slope" analysis is bunk. Every state we looked at had a down slope for both candidates (except MN).
It really activates my almonds when the errors always benefit one side
I haven't seen a single story about a glitch benefitting the president
... Shit. My model didn't account for house races smaller than a county and wasn't accumulating.
OK. Fixed
`Too late, your graph caused a coup` - Plague Inc, Election 2020 version
:p
LOL
I mean... It make NC mecklenburg looks way worse!
Man someone does need to make such a game though
And a big tech censorship game too
Where you wackamole posts
Where you tweet up mobs of boss-calling, blue haired, gender free hordes to knock out your competition
Competition being other activists (now nazis), and non activists (nazis)
I mean, if your culture is producing and seriously threatened by these people, perhaps your culture isn't worth saving...
that looks like random samplings of ngo's daily lists
is trump sleeping
looooooooooool
what is the last tweet 🤣
Well played, Mr. President.
if Israel, said Biden win, looooooooooooool, Israel dump trump 🤣 🤣 🤣 even he do to Israel more than US 😁
?
Can I get any feed back on whether this is accurate, please guys.
It's causing a few arguments.
Is it true, are they reliable sources. But coupled with the ddos attacks I'm thinking it may be.
rofl
Forgive me @RobertGrulerEsq for posting alternate lawyers on your Discord, but this is relevant to a discussion point from yesterday. It seems Robert Barnes agrees *somewhat* with me on how an election can and needs to prove itself valid:
"Rather than impose on those who want the right rules to be applied that you have to prove fraud first, that's never been the standard. If there was no fraud, then you shouldn't be scared of doing the simple recanvassing that the rules are designed to do"
https://youtu.be/JPNhiTExv1Q?t=6100
J. Alex Halderman:
By analyzing the structure of the Q.R. codes, I have been able to learn that there's nothing that stops an attacker from just duplicating one, and the duplicate would count the same as the original bar code.
And in late September, another concern came to light. During testing, election workers found half the names of the 21 candidates for Senate intermittently disappeared from screens during the review phase.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/will-georgias-new-voting-machines-solve-election-problems-or-make-them-worse