Message from @Shitty Kitty
Discord ID: 777749775818031114
That's Flynn's lawyer (nice work). This seems better than what she's been peddling for the last couple weeks with equal confidence. Should be interesting.
Just an update on the status of the Shiva theory. https://youtu.be/aokNwKx7gM8
Confirms what we thought. The existence of the slope doesn't matter.
Especially with how many slopes we found here. https://bitcadia.github.io/DownBallot/index.html
They found a bunch of 'lost' ballots for Trump, but not 'fraud' LOL
> Question would be if the law provides any guidance on the discretionary part
@RobertGrulerEsq
I may have found the guidance
Which state is that?
Wisconsin.
Original thread on Wisconsin law.
https://discord.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/776952625882857492
> Just an update on the status of the Shiva theory. https://youtu.be/aokNwKx7gM8
@DrSammyD yeah his analysis (or his recreation of Shiva's analysis) is a little different than I thought. I thought it was top of ticket divided by downline voting on a per party basis and I think that's what you were plotting. MI is somewhat unique because it allows for straight line party voting and I think many states have done away with that. I defer to his analysis since he recreated Shiva's results. Now it does bring up some interesting questions about what went on in GA. That one Rep Sen got nearly an identical vote count as Trump, but the Dem candidate was nearly 100k down from Biden. Part of it was that the Libertarian candidate for Sen had almost twice the total as the Libertarian candidate for Pres. The other part of was that top of the ticket voters outnumbered downline in this case by some ~40k.
Again my interest in the GA Sen is more as to who is likely to win the runoff.
is any of this going to come into play? https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
@meglide Don't get me wrong, I still think Mish has way too few independents voting Trump purely because of the MN, IL, and WI results, which I found due to this type of analysis, so it bore fruit. But yeah, the pure "slope" analysis is bunk. Every state we looked at had a down slope for both candidates (except MN).
It really activates my almonds when the errors always benefit one side
I haven't seen a single story about a glitch benefitting the president
... Shit. My model didn't account for house races smaller than a county and wasn't accumulating.
OK. Fixed
`Too late, your graph caused a coup` - Plague Inc, Election 2020 version
:p
LOL
I mean... It make NC mecklenburg looks way worse!
Man someone does need to make such a game though
And a big tech censorship game too
Where you wackamole posts
And a Cancel It game
Where you tweet up mobs of boss-calling, blue haired, gender free hordes to knock out your competition
Competition being other activists (now nazis), and non activists (nazis)
I mean, if your culture is producing and seriously threatened by these people, perhaps your culture isn't worth saving...
that looks like random samplings of ngo's daily lists
is trump sleeping
looooooooooool
what is the last tweet 🤣
Well played, Mr. President.