Message from @Repeat

Discord ID: 779909181536206858


2020-11-22 02:52:33 UTC  

prime number theorem đź‘€

2020-11-22 02:52:37 UTC  

that seems interesting heh

2020-11-22 02:53:54 UTC  

It's a sneaky pattern, but it does exist in the data.

2020-11-22 02:54:17 UTC  

He's just very bad at explaining it

2020-11-22 02:54:28 UTC  

mmm I might get that data and see if I can replicate, if i get bored

2020-11-22 02:54:40 UTC  

even just to test that prime number theorem thing

2020-11-22 02:54:44 UTC  

sounds interesting

2020-11-22 02:54:48 UTC  

If you can find another city, that'd be awesome

2020-11-22 02:55:07 UTC  

lol he apologized for his microwave

2020-11-22 02:55:13 UTC  

heh

2020-11-22 02:55:14 UTC  

yep

2020-11-22 02:55:28 UTC  

he says he took his data off the NYT feed or somesuch

2020-11-22 02:56:07 UTC  

Edison I believe is what they said

2020-11-22 02:57:11 UTC  

lol we've never had so many people try to look for statistical anomalies as now

2020-11-22 02:57:14 UTC  

in any dataset ever

2020-11-22 03:01:44 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/779904422414909501/r1cdgx6ttnp41.png

2020-11-22 03:16:43 UTC  

Why do I feel like I just watched a video trying to prove Numerology using the PA (or would that be PN) periodic data reports?

2020-11-22 03:18:57 UTC  

It appears this may all be moot... The PA state legislature voted to have the election audited (risk limiting, apparently). We should have the results by Feb 2021. https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2020/11/19/Divided-Pennsylvania-House-gives-approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/stories/202011190148

2020-11-22 03:19:15 UTC  

Like I said, if the pattern doesn't repeat in other cities precincts, then he's likely on to something.

2020-11-22 03:20:26 UTC  

Did you guys see “Greg on the Right” videos?

2020-11-22 03:22:12 UTC  

@Repeat Yeah... we discussed it earlier today.

2020-11-22 03:22:52 UTC  

I offered my thoughts at 1:59PM.

2020-11-22 03:24:52 UTC  

@Zuluzeit An invisible kraken is at least 4 times as effective

2020-11-22 03:26:37 UTC  

Dang, I miss everything while I am at work! Ty for the time stamp

2020-11-22 03:30:05 UTC  

Hmmm... Talk about a winning strategy that is certain to bring the dignity back to the process: https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-wisconsin-elections-dcb7da95578fc7289122c6d372575a9b

2020-11-22 03:30:11 UTC  

rofl

2020-11-22 03:32:10 UTC  

:/

2020-11-22 03:38:27 UTC  

How did PA do "early voting"? Here in MI, it was just a regular absentee ballot but dome in the clerk's office. Would explain the same day sent and return dates.

2020-11-22 03:44:28 UTC  

You’re thinking they picked them up before they could be mailed? @DisenchantedTruth

2020-11-22 03:44:28 UTC  

@Repeat, you just advanced to level 2!

2020-11-22 03:46:37 UTC  

Here's a hypothetical... How much money would it take for you to create a backdoor in your software providing the ability to flip an election and activate it in an election where the incumbent has been telling the world that the election is going to be rigged against him and knowing that it will likely be the most contested result in history, as a result? You would basically have to make enough money to have to never work again I am guessing, because you would be in prison.

2020-11-22 03:48:45 UTC  

I was talking about the ones that went out and came back in the same day or even those which came back the next day. Those were the vast majority. I think there were about 20,000 that had a later send date than receive date...I have no possible explanation for those.

2020-11-22 03:49:45 UTC  

I see but I guess it’s also possible that maybe his column is inaccurately described and should say “scheduled mail date?

2020-11-22 03:49:52 UTC  

Backdoor has been in for years, from what I'm understanding. They've probably been charging people to use it the whole time.

2020-11-22 03:50:46 UTC  

For the sake of truly investigating the data, I wonder if that was possible that it was a scheduled mail date

2020-11-22 03:50:54 UTC  

Makes sense.

2020-11-22 03:51:27 UTC  

I could buy into that but I would like to see it investigated to prove it either way

2020-11-22 03:51:29 UTC  

Either way, it's too easy to discard this as being likely to be "normal" and not shocking proof.

2020-11-22 03:51:46 UTC  

Agreed. Investigate everything!

2020-11-22 03:54:49 UTC  

If it has been there for that long, what does that mean about 2016? Is that why Trump disbanded his commission 2018 that spent 2 years trying to prove that fraud explained Clinton's popular vote win?