It’s an anti corruption software used by many Fortune 500 giants.

You’re asking for a bit too much

@JonM16, you just advanced to level 4!

https://www.ajc.com/politics/election/trump-formally-requests-recount-in-georgia/TXCURGSK7ZE4PJYPQNR4NEI7QY/

Other parties have never really had a chance😞 even before the internet

@Repeat, you just advanced to level 4!

@Repeat You cant have parties and a democracy at the same time.

So similar to Red Owl?

In a representative democracy you elect people. Like when you guys elect sheriffs

Thanks @TaLoN132

The problem isn't that their isn't honest politicians, its figuring out which ones are honest through all of the BS.

@linuxace Here is a rule of the thumb; judge a man by his character and his character by his merits.

@Repeat As someone who also aspires to act with integrity, I'm also incredulous that others are so seemingly willing to compromise their principles for their 15 minutes or in a misguided "ends justifies the means" effort to tip the scales.

"Behold these climbing monkeys, as they climb over and under each other and sometimes tear another down into the mud below" - Nietzsche, Also Sprach Zarathustra

There is no lessor of two evils? Just evil!?

define evil?

self serving?

then vote for the self sacrificing.

Evil=illegal for me

oh, so Mengele wasnt evil?

And just like that, we got to Godwin’s Law

I mean it's the easiest refutation of Illegal=evil

No, no it’s deeper than that for sure. Not going there we are not third world, or at least I chose to believe we aren’t and that we have more sophisticated laws.

well, indeed. They offer themselves as the perfect example. @JonM16

I’m want politicians that don’t break laws. How’s that? Lol

@Repeat Good laws spring out of ethics. But some times they part ways.

The one who breaks the least amount of laws gets my vote

Thus making the definition of legality as "good" very dangerous.

But we don’t have to go that far to refute evil or terrible or worse ideas

Evil is extremely hard to define.

As is good.

Darth Vader and Adolf Hitler thus lends themselves as examples.

Before that it was the Kaiser and Napoleon.

The one who breaks the least amount of laws gets my vote. The irony here

I would like to remind you that the founding fathers were all criminals.

Yes @Doc the definitely were

If you're going by Nietsche nearly everything of importance will be hard to define.

I think this would be a good start: https://www.theadvocates.org/2016/10/aggression/

But the founding fathers wanted to start a new country. I don’t

@linuxace Except academic bovine and crowds.

The NAP eventually self contradicts once you get to enforcement.