It was an "insurance policy".

Man, look at the excuses here. Unrral.

It was done before, dude.

What excuses?

Before the election. They were spying on him during the campaign. That was the scandal. Carter Page didn't get set up for colluding to get emails after the election.

I think that this speaks to the issue I was originally bringing up. Politics are the new religion.

For the left.

Yes.

For both sides in my honest opinion.

How is asserting the facts in a case "religion".

Praytell.

This isnt faith. Its reality.

The goal of both sides is power. Trump won the election and did so without selling his sole to the power brokers in Washington. That was unacceptible.

Republicans jump in the line of fire to defend things Trump does which are sometimes indefensible.

Nothing to scale compared to this, or beating people in the streets.

You're kidding? Tell me you're kidding.

Religion doesn't just mean violence.

Defending a tweet and punching someone and beating them isn't the same thing.

Again, why use religion to define political violence?

@Benny2Toes In this case, facts are subjective because each side believes that facts are on their side because they believe what it espoused by their side and summarily reject anything that comes from the other.

Isn't that what I said?

@TaLoN132 no. These are bi-partisan facts im speaking of. The dems admit it. They just argued that the dossier wasn't used. We now know it was the basis for Fisa.

So, again...these are the facts. Anyone can go read them.

> I think that this speaks to the issue I was originally bringing up. Politics are the new religion.
@TaLoN132
> For the left.
@Benny2Toes
> For both sides in my honest opinion.
@Maw

I'm the only one with actual factual knowledge of this thing. Thats far from religion.

Nothing here about violence.

Yes, we conveniently moved on when no one could answer my video link question.

But it was initially about that.

What question was that?

I did, and I agreed with you and pointed out a relatively common talking point from the other side.

@Benny2Toes We all seem to forget that that was all part of a "fruit of the poison vine" type of defense. It doesn't change the fact that there were meetings between the Trump campaign and Russians that were not reported as required by law. I don't think that there was any collusion, but I do think Don Jr was eager to please his Dad.

Show me the counterpart on the right to what ai posted and the 10,000 other videos like it showing leftists assaulting trump supporters

Again, already agree with you, so that'd be kind of against the grain, no?

@TaLoN132 yeah, the trump tower meeting Russians were sent by Perkins Cole. Also been proven and documented.

It was a setup

Why is Discord sending me emails about a conversation I'm actively involved in?

I find all this to be BS. The senate isn't just some compromise, it is what allowed the union to grow. Why would any small state want to join a union where there is a correlated disparity in ideologies that results in some massive ideological group far away to dictate local rules?

Would you want china to become the 51st state?

It's only democracy after all!

Nevermind that their ideologies would vastly destroy you locally

I fear DC becoming a state!