Message from @GregInHouston2
Discord ID: 780114504574566400
@TaLoN132 What's your point?
@GregInHouston2 By that same logic, Biden did not need to cheat. The polls indicated he would win in a landslide.
@TaLoN132 No, the polls indicated she would win and they were believed to be accurate. This year, they did not make that mistake.
The key difference - they were believed.
BTW, I don't believe Biden cheated; I don't think he is that competent. But the cheating was done on his behalf.
@Benny2Toes Those are all post transition. Show me how she actively worked to undermine Trump's transition.
She PAID for the dossier. Forget it. Its pointless.
@Benny2Toes, you just advanced to level 10!
The evidence shows Biden and Obama did that. I don't think she was in a position to do that.
Hillary is competent to rig an election. She apparently knew Trump would be way ahead election night but would come out ahead after that.
OMG. This isnt "belief". It has been proven and documented. Even the Mueller report docilumented that the DNC and Fusion GPS were behind this at the behest of Clinton.
The Mueller report said a lot about Trump, too. But people are very willing to discount that.
Okay, that is accurate. But this was done before election day. She arranged for it to be passed on after the election.
It was an "insurance policy".
Man, look at the excuses here. Unrral.
It was done before, dude.
Before the election. They were spying on him during the campaign. That was the scandal. Carter Page didn't get set up for colluding to get emails after the election.
I think that this speaks to the issue I was originally bringing up. Politics are the new religion.
For the left.
Yes.
For both sides in my honest opinion.
How is asserting the facts in a case "religion".
Praytell.
This isnt faith. Its reality.
The goal of both sides is power. Trump won the election and did so without selling his sole to the power brokers in Washington. That was unacceptible.
Republicans jump in the line of fire to defend things Trump does which are sometimes indefensible.
Nothing to scale compared to this, or beating people in the streets.
You're kidding? Tell me you're kidding.
Religion doesn't just mean violence.
Defending a tweet and punching someone and beating them isn't the same thing.
Again, why use religion to define political violence?
@Benny2Toes In this case, facts are subjective because each side believes that facts are on their side because they believe what it espoused by their side and summarily reject anything that comes from the other.
Isn't that what I said?
@TaLoN132 no. These are bi-partisan facts im speaking of. The dems admit it. They just argued that the dossier wasn't used. We now know it was the basis for Fisa.
So, again...these are the facts. Anyone can go read them.
> I think that this speaks to the issue I was originally bringing up. Politics are the new religion.
@TaLoN132
> For the left.
@Benny2Toes
> For both sides in my honest opinion.
@Maw