Powell said she had a firehose of evidence in an interview on 11/8 and said she was filing suit in a couple of days, at the time. You don't have to have your entire case ready when you file.

If the bulk of the fraud comes from a hack in electronic machines, it will be extremely hard to overturn. Vulnerability of electronic voting should have been addressed before the election. You'd need absolute smoking-gun evidence to have it count.

Again, I have not taken a position on Powell's evidence. I think time will indicate the trustworthiness of her statements.

I’ve unfortunately already taken my position on her evidence. I’ve never seen anything like this before

Powell is the victim of a dis-info campaign. I've said this for a week now.

At one point of time people had never seen a black swan before as well. That didn't mean they didn't exist.

We can look forward to separate press conferences now. Do we have an official roster of Trump's legal team, in order to avoid these unreasonable inferences? Or maybe they can continue to be jettisoned, when they become too embarrassing.

Thank you. Sometimes I feel like I’m taking crazy pills listening to the theories

as in Powell mistakenly believed disinformation

I've not ruled that out as well. In fact that was my first thought.

(and not that the media is spreading disinformation about her)

See here

Well she said she has evidence

Robert suggested that the other day

Believing in disinformation doesn't make a lawyer forget what legal evidence looks like. Come on. @realz

@linuxace The first of the year?? All of the data has been ready for analysis for a while now. Recounts have been ordered and completed or about to be completed. People have been offering rewards and whistleblowers are rewarded handsomely (the USPS guy had a GoFundMe reach $150K in 2 days. If anyone was going to come forward, they would have by now and anyone that comes forward now is unlikely to have any evidence to back up their claims. What do expect to happen with 6 more weeks?

Yep. I could have sworn that he read my comment live on stream 😄

😄

She claims to have the evidence, so she couldn’t be a victim of disinformation since she’s seen the “evidence”

@Zuluzeit She's a criminal lawyer, not a civil lawyer.

https://youtu.be/746HTjhFifA

Has anyone watched this? I think it does a good job of summarizing a lot of the circumstantial evidence

@liftandstudy, you just advanced to level 2!

I don't think that is the issue. The issue is how long it takes to organize the evidence to make a compelling case. My view is that IF the evidence exists, we are still within reasonable time scales for that evidence to be processed, prepared, and presented. That doesn't mean the evidence doesn't exist even though it may not, just too early for those of us out of the loop to make that determination.

@DrSammyD I'm not sure that is an acceptable excuse, if one presumes to insinuate themself into this very, very important issue.

It's not an excuse, it's an explanation of why she's susceptible to it

I get it. Js, she went to law school.

That and her trying to parlay her success as a Trumpian Lawyer into some sort of politician.

I dunno, I was just explaining what I thought Sammy was saying

But, Trump did her a favor of not having to present her case in court and get laughed out of there.

Lol oh yes

There's a reason that Georgia was SUPER happy to do a recount and confirm the numbers which Dominion reported.

It is possible that Trump had some confidential intelligence that Powell was being played and that is what prompted the shift.

Maybe she will astonish us all, yet.

Not so much on the signatures

Powell's main witness was Ramsland, who was the one that presented evidence that mixed up MI and MN. This might be the backlash. The only one that is able to make a fool of themselves and get away with it in Trump's eyes is Rudy, apparently.

if she was going to astonish, she's taking her sweet time to do it

I’m sorry at what point is it acceptable for a lawyer to put in doubt the whole election process of the United States, without presenting any evidence or even compelling arguments. To call in question the democracy and elections of the US has ramifications around the world, this is not a small matter.

Lol poor Rudy. Caricature of himself.

Have you read our Federalist papers? Our whole system is built on distrust of government.

my understanding is that at one point GA didn't have paper ballots for votes cast on election day via the machine and they upgraded their whole system such that there was a paper trail, that the voters themselves could see, and that could be counted by hand to rule out any fraud by the machines

Have you read the anti-federalist papers showing that most of that rhetoric was a lie?