Message from @realz
Discord ID: 780844643200925736
I am curious about one thing when it comes to fraud claims. If you believe that the election was stolen, what consequences do you see as a result?
Alleging fraud in public then not being able to argue it in court is a red flag. Just means you are putting on a show
Why is it that all the conspiracy people don't bring up Braynard
At least he seems above board and has some potential
Consequences are: 1) Our nation is over, ended, destroyed. 2) Civil War is justified with the election of our national enemies.
Civil war is always justified
If you are willing to die for it
@Doc They will put 'The Left' in prison and our rightful leaser will rule supreme for all time. So sayeth the prophecy.
@Whithers well, indeed, if you can steal an election, that involves so many people and so many crimes - and the ability to hide them, you would need soviet style mass arrests to get it back together again.
In my book it is
Suicide bombings are bing called civil war now?
There are no rules about civil war
If you willing to die for some principle or another, it is your right
The human being is able to justify anything. That is what makes it so dangerous.
No, Civil War isn’t justifiable in a nation of United States of America in which we stand....
Yes it is
I can list you 10 things that I could see the founders themselves making a civil war over
And another 10 that others would justify
Im not sure you can justify 1776....
You can't say "that isn't justified"
Exactly lol
The shenanigans we pulled
I volunteer as opponent if anyone wants to try.
Those "massacres"
Oh yea "taxation without representation" lol tell that to expats
No it is not. This is the justification for Civil War:
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
The Left are enemies of our heritage, of all ethical government, and of our species.
What a joke
Pretty much what I have had to do. Apparently I am part of a majority according to Bill O’reilly. He says the MNN are all doing massive layoffs now after election because their ratings have dropped to 2 million lol
'Justify' might have suffered some dilution damage recently. I'm not sure justifying something is necessary to do it anyway.
@Whithers If you want to justify something, you are supposed to use your own words.
No, the atheist is able to justify anything. That is why they have no ethical standing.
you cant have an ethical standing. Ethics is the philosophy of morals.
That is the only justification for an American.
You lack a kind of empathy to keep framing things in terms of atheism or enemies and friends
You cant have a "philosphical standing"
That is an incorrect statement.
well...you can, but it means something different.