it basically requires 2/3 agreement

i.e something has to be bipartisan

Unless the court is unbalanced

Uh no

That's literally not how it works

2/3 of judges or like congress or something

I am talking about amending the constitution, what does that have to do with the court

The court has no impact on it's contents

Oh

@Zuluzeit well, bedtime for me now. You have a nice one!

Nite

@Doc I bid you the same. Sleep well.

as it stands right now, if the SC justices go rogue in full bad faith, there is NO check on the SC

I don’t know what this is yet but I think we need it

(except packing them or impeaching them?)

All hail section 230

Ah sigh

section 230 reform is a trojan horse

Bringing the government in to regulate speech on social media scares the shit out of me. But if done right, would be preferable to the alternative.

Can Biden backtrack all Trumps policies

Who knows

Apparently president trump is not allowed to take back DACA

The Supreme Court does that

So by similar argument, a president biden should also be unable to pull back president trump's policy

But something tells me that's not the way it would go down

Maybe he doesn’t want to take sole responsibility?

Like look the courts agreed

Im guessing Trump will be making alot of new crazy policies. Like the execution of 6 death row immates

He is killing people out of spite?

President trump has a history of supporting the death penality. It's not a spite thing

Sorry... Making dinner... I don't think that the Left sees the court as a shortcut, per se. No more than the Right in trying to do things like overturning Obama Care. The key is to have a court that will provide the checks and balance that the constitution intended. A super majority that rubber stamps conservative actions/legislation and blocks liberal actions/legislation would not be in keeping with our democratic ideals.

He told Barr by December 6 will die

Because according to global media, the Republicans have already "packed the courts".

That should be old news though, that's from a while ago

When AG Barr authorized the use for 6 inmates

He did..

@MatiLuc, you just advanced to level 10!

Unless there are new inmates, I'll have to check

They literally did this for Gay Marriage

And Roe v Wade

you obviously haven't listened to them talking about the SC, because they view it as a nice juicy target for this very reason