Message from @MatiLuc

Discord ID: 781741916139683881


2020-11-27 04:33:14 UTC  

@Doc I bid you the same. Sleep well.

2020-11-27 04:37:32 UTC  

as it stands right now, if the SC justices go rogue in full bad faith, there is NO check on the SC

2020-11-27 04:37:33 UTC  

I don’t know what this is yet but I think we need it

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/781740475743862784/image0.png

2020-11-27 04:37:42 UTC  

(except packing them or impeaching them?)

2020-11-27 04:37:44 UTC  

All hail section 230

2020-11-27 04:37:52 UTC  

Ah sigh

2020-11-27 04:37:57 UTC  

section 230 reform is a trojan horse

2020-11-27 04:39:00 UTC  

Bringing the government in to regulate speech on social media scares the shit out of me. But if done right, would be preferable to the alternative.

2020-11-27 04:39:03 UTC  

Can Biden backtrack all Trumps policies

2020-11-27 04:39:47 UTC  

Who knows

2020-11-27 04:40:07 UTC  

Apparently president trump is not allowed to take back DACA

2020-11-27 04:40:31 UTC  

The Supreme Court does that

2020-11-27 04:40:41 UTC  

So by similar argument, a president biden should also be unable to pull back president trump's policy

2020-11-27 04:41:03 UTC  

But something tells me that's not the way it would go down

2020-11-27 04:41:43 UTC  

Maybe he doesn’t want to take sole responsibility?

2020-11-27 04:41:49 UTC  

Like look the courts agreed

2020-11-27 04:41:53 UTC  

Im guessing Trump will be making alot of new crazy policies. Like the execution of 6 death row immates

2020-11-27 04:42:10 UTC  

He is killing people out of spite?

2020-11-27 04:42:44 UTC  

President trump has a history of supporting the death penality. It's not a spite thing

2020-11-27 04:43:05 UTC  

Sorry... Making dinner... I don't think that the Left sees the court as a shortcut, per se. No more than the Right in trying to do things like overturning Obama Care. The key is to have a court that will provide the checks and balance that the constitution intended. A super majority that rubber stamps conservative actions/legislation and blocks liberal actions/legislation would not be in keeping with our democratic ideals.

2020-11-27 04:43:16 UTC  

He told Barr by December 6 will die

2020-11-27 04:43:25 UTC  

Because according to global media, the Republicans have already "packed the courts".

2020-11-27 04:43:36 UTC  

That should be old news though, that's from a while ago

2020-11-27 04:43:55 UTC  

When AG Barr authorized the use for 6 inmates

2020-11-27 04:44:27 UTC  

He did..

2020-11-27 04:44:27 UTC  

@MatiLuc, you just advanced to level 10!

2020-11-27 04:44:30 UTC  

Unless there are new inmates, I'll have to check

2020-11-27 04:44:36 UTC  

They literally did this for Gay Marriage

2020-11-27 04:44:56 UTC  

And Roe v Wade

2020-11-27 04:45:25 UTC  

you obviously haven't listened to them talking about the SC, because they view it as a nice juicy target for this very reason

2020-11-27 04:45:39 UTC  

hence the phrasing "Judicial Activism"

2020-11-27 04:45:56 UTC  

Popular opinion is on the side of keeping it right

2020-11-27 04:46:09 UTC  

What does this have to do with what republicans will do in retaliation ?

2020-11-27 04:46:42 UTC  

Keeping what

2020-11-27 04:47:39 UTC  

I thought the idea was that roe vs wade or gay marriage could be repealed without the Supreme Court like Daca technically could be. I don’t know I’m not paying attention

2020-11-27 04:47:51 UTC  

nope

2020-11-27 04:47:56 UTC  

DACA is an executive order

2020-11-27 04:48:06 UTC  

any president could nix it

2020-11-27 04:48:18 UTC  

Row V Wade was "interpreted" into the constitution

2020-11-27 04:48:28 UTC  

But the backlash would be pretty big

2020-11-27 04:48:31 UTC  

which means only another SC or a constitutional amendement can change it